pankajkoti commented on code in PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857#discussion_r1405349816
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1577,15 +1577,18 @@ def _fail_tasks_stuck_in_queued(self, session: Session
= NEW_SESSION) -> None:
)
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857#discussion_r1405350011
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1577,15 +1577,18 @@ def _fail_tasks_stuck_in_queued(self, session: Session
= NEW_SESSION) -> None:
pankajkoti commented on code in PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857#discussion_r1405350927
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1577,15 +1577,18 @@ def _fail_tasks_stuck_in_queued(self, session: Session
= NEW_SESSION) -> None:
)
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857#discussion_r1405351054
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1577,15 +1577,18 @@ def _fail_tasks_stuck_in_queued(self, session: Session
= NEW_SESSION) -> None:
dolfinus commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826720961
I'd rather prefer to show some kind of warning such a case than completely
forbid it. Some users may successfully use this combination, there is no
statistics related to this
--
Th
pankajkoti closed pull request #35857: Send explicit task logs when marking
tasks stuck in queued as failed
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
pankajkoti merged PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airfl
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pankajkoti pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c7e13061bd Send explicit task logs when markin
Taragolis commented on PR #35844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35844#issuecomment-1826743579
There is couple of solution already exists, note this not end of list, I
believe there is also exist couple solution, so this list not final
**Solution 1**:
one of the, is J
potiuk merged PR #35856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35856
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new d36848828b Optimize CI/PROD image waiting and verif
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35858
Small follow-up after #35856 - cache building uses constraints so rather
than describing it, we add arrow-dependency
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
potiuk commented on PR #35858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35858#issuecomment-1826754865
More accurate:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/assets/595491/29e13a85-2244-4eab-88ad-982abfd86c1f";>
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35859:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35859
When we skip breeze image pre-commits, we do not have breeze image
available, because we want to run them as fast as possible. In this case we
should not attempt to run "ownership fixing" - because:
potiuk commented on PR #35859:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35859#issuecomment-1826758445
This is why "basic static checks" in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/6995199303/job/19029787821?pr=35858#step:8:183
took 1m32 seconds instead of 30 seconds.
--
This is
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35860
The new tests in breeze depended implicitly on the fact they were running in
`main` branch, but when run in v2*test, they should use the AIRFLOW_BRANCH as
the expected branch rather than `main` expli
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ca97dd67d4 Skip running "fix ownership" when Breeze
potiuk merged PR #35859:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35859
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk merged PR #35860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35860
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c3719d966e Make environment tests for breeze branch
potiuk merged PR #35858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35858
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from c3719d966e Make environment tests for breeze branch-agnostic (#35860)
add df6631ec08 Clarify constraints use in ca
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862
Breeze `shell` command has been foreseen eventually to also allow single
commands in CI and pre-commit, and we are preparing it to be able to do so with
all the bells and whistles. There are a few im
potiuk commented on PR #35862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862#issuecomment-1826790086
This is a logically-separated PR from #35830 as discussed in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#pullrequestreview-1748817163
It's mostly revolving about making `breeze sh
tirkarthi opened a new pull request, #35863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35863
closes: #30328
related: #30328
--
This is an automated message from the A
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request, #35864:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35864
There are other options for connecting to weaviate. This commit adds these
other options and also improved the imports/typing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
potiuk commented on PR #35862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862#issuecomment-1826794060
BTW. Even with those small fixes adde - it should be FAR easier to review
than https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
potiuk commented on PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#issuecomment-1826794451
As discussed with @jscheffl -> the "breeze command flag update" separated
part ot of this PR has been moved to #35862 . I will rebase this one on top of
it.
--
This is an automated
potiuk commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-182681
Actually, that fix was separated out to a slightly smaller one
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862
I **could** split it out even further if reviewers think it makes sense
potiuk commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-1826801193
The part that fixes the problem you had is here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862/files#diff-6ef5b756e45d03d3723ba4a5c4b0f1417b115fe25560f293351c30290ec67b31R127
potiuk commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826801975
> I'd rather prefer to show some kind of warning in such a case than
completely forbid it. Some users may successfully use this combination, there
is no statistics related to this
potiuk commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826802063
> I'd rather prefer to show some kind of warning in such a case than
completely forbid it. Some users may successfully use this combination, there
is no statistics related to this
dolfinus commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826802369
No idea, and I'm not interested in this kind if solution.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
potiuk commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826802597
> No idea, and I'm not interested in this kind if solution.
Pity. You loose opportunity to become one of 2700 contributors to Airflow.
--
This is an automated message from the A
kadai0308 commented on issue #35795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35795#issuecomment-1826803699
Hi I am Kadai, new to here and looking forward to contribute. After go
through the description and source code, i think i can fix this issue. Can you
please assign this issue to
potiuk commented on PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#issuecomment-1826803741
Marking as Draft so that it's not merged accidentally before #35862 gets
merged , but generally speaking - the last commit is quite ready and "complete"
for review.
--
This is an auto
dolfinus commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826804501
> You loose opportunity to become one of 2700 contributors to Airflow.
I already am.
If maintainers are not interested of merging PR which avoids producing wrong
pod descr
potiuk opened a new issue, #35865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35865
### Body
Sometimes (rather rarely) the "check_processes" in
`tests/cli/commands/test_webserver_command.py::TestCliWebServer::test_cli_webserver_background`
detects some remaining processes.
potiuk commented on PR #34331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1826808549
> If maintainers are not interested of merging PR which avoids producing
wrong pod description, and instead prefer to do nothing with that for months -
ok, but very pitty to hear.
kadai0308 commented on issue #35795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35795#issuecomment-1826809213
After digging deeper, the issue already been fixed in google-cloud-bigquery
version 3.13 [MR](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/pull/1682)
--
This is an automated m
eladkal commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826812024
> #35790 works
>
> It has caused a problem with the example DAG (addressed in #35839) but the
operator changes themselves work
Thanks. Since functionality work as expe
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826815324
I am not going to block it in this form - but - as explained in a number of
messages - I have a huge concern about
a) making it part of official airflow tooling
b) making it p
fpopic commented on code in PR #35855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35855#discussion_r1405422826
##
airflow/providers/hashicorp/_internal_client/vault_client.py:
##
@@ -291,13 +298,47 @@ def _auth_gcp(self, _client: hvac.Client) -> None:
)
scop
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826819752
I wonder - what others think about it. Especially those who were in Airflow
when we migrated to Airflow 2. from 1.10.15.
And just to add a bit more context. We did release
https:/
fpopic commented on code in PR #35855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35855#discussion_r1405424437
##
airflow/providers/hashicorp/_internal_client/vault_client.py:
##
@@ -291,13 +298,47 @@ def _auth_gcp(self, _client: hvac.Client) -> None:
)
scop
fpopic commented on code in PR #35855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35855#discussion_r1405424437
##
airflow/providers/hashicorp/_internal_client/vault_client.py:
##
@@ -291,13 +298,47 @@ def _auth_gcp(self, _client: hvac.Client) -> None:
)
scop
jscheffl commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826823839
Hi @potiuk Yes, maybe this is a mis-understanding. I did NOT want to make
this script a release piece. If we see we need it in other cases we _could_
leverage it.
So it is now i
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826824513
And... Fantastic you are doing it ! Thanks for that!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
eladkal commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826833780
> making it part of our repository in general
I see no problem with that.
Mssql is considered experimental. We can publish it under statmant of best
effort.
In the mailing l
hussein-awala commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826836426
I tested https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185 and
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35635, they work as expected.
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
bolkedebruin opened a new pull request, #35867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35867
Several serialized object could expose sensitive information in the UI
through XCom values. This generalizes how encryption works,
including versioning of the protocol.
This is a pr
jscheffl opened a new pull request, #35868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35868
DRAFT PR to remove MSSQL support from Airflow
Open items:
- Green build
- Check that breeze works as expected
- Discuss whether the matix action in Github needs a change for coverage?
bolkedebruin merged PR #35747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35747
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@air
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bolke pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new fa94ee9ebb Simplify io.path (#35747)
fa94ee9ebb is d
raphaelauv commented on PR #35844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35844#issuecomment-1826844693
I agree that a general solution for all operator is better than adding the
feature to that specific operator
So the main question is
Do we agree that a pythonOperator b
pankajkoti commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826851639
Tested my set of PRs, all work fine, thank you for the the release efforts!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
bolkedebruin commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826863178
I missed this - why was the non standard `make_serializable` chosen over the
standard `serialize` and `deserialize` methods? It also missed versioning and
adds to the pre-commits h
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 90477fa3e5 Updating con
bolkedebruin commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826867395
I would like to see a re-discussion of
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319 before including it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
Joffreybvn commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826875406
I'm whiling to create a new PR and pause/drop this one.
But, during the implementation of this PR, I could not create/instantiate
pyobc.Row objects ([which is a C++
object](ht
potiuk commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826875811
I do not think it has anything to do with "standard" behaviour. This is an
internal implementation of Hooks - each DB hooks might make their own decision
on how to make the (already comm
potiuk commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826875916
> I would like to see a re-discussion of #32319 before including it.
I think this is misunderstanding what #32319 wants to achieve. Commented
there.
--
This is an automated
potiuk commented on PR #35862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862#issuecomment-182681
> First I was fearing the size to review - until I realized that 50% was
boilerplate code changes and 50% SVG image generated :-D LGTM!
Precisely :).
--
This is an automated me
potiuk merged PR #35862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk commented on PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#issuecomment-1826878279
OK. Merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35862 so made it ready for
review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
wojkam73159 commented on issue #21377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21377#issuecomment-1826878579
Hi, is this issue is still open?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk commented on PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#issuecomment-1826878756
BTW. If this is still too big I am happy to move pre-commit by pre-commit
separately .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
Tony-1993 opened a new issue, #35869:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35869
### Official Helm Chart version
1.11.0 (latest released)
### Apache Airflow version
2.3.4
### Kubernetes Version
1.24.16-gke.500
### Helm Chart configuration
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #35869:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35869#issuecomment-1826881506
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for ap
bolkedebruin commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826883406
Hey @Joffreybvn thanks for responding and apologies for being late to the
game and being a bit rough. It isn't required to return the same during
deserialization as is provided thr
dstandish commented on code in PR #35857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35857#discussion_r1405470805
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1577,15 +1577,18 @@ def _fail_tasks_stuck_in_queued(self, session: Session
= NEW_SESSION) -> None:
)
potiuk commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826887657
> Why is the common _make_serializable method required?
For the reason described above - comon "airflow standard" returned output of
DBApiHook. All the DBApiHook implementations r
potiuk commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826888353
Also -I think really you are mixing the problem here It's not
serialize/deserialize we are talking about here. And IMHO the name very well
reflects the intention. We are not trying t
potiuk commented on issue #35845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35845#issuecomment-1826889795
Conflirmed my template + reproducible builds worl (works great! PR shortly
to a better PMC verification step is coming soon :) )
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
boushphong opened a new issue, #35870:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35870
### Apache Airflow version
2.7.3
### What happened
When multiple airflow tasks finish at about the same time, and those tasks
are also responsible for triggering other Dag via Data
bolkedebruin commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826892062
> Also -I think really you are mixing the problem here It's not
serialize/deserialize we are talking about here. And IMHO the name very well
reflects the intention. We are not
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35871
The reproducible build we just added makes it possible to run full
reproducible package builds (byte-to-byte reproducible) - which means that
whoever uses the same sources of Airflow (and official 3r
boushphong opened a new issue, #35872:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35872
### Apache Airflow version
2.7.3
### What happened
We have a Secret backend that retrieves connection uri. We encountered an
error where if we have a connection uri that has multip
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477319
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
hduong-mwam commented on code in PR #35719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35719#discussion_r1405478899
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/index.tsx:
##
@@ -138,6 +146,7 @@ const Details = ({
const isGroupOrMappedTaskSummary = isGroup || isMappedTaskSummary;
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
hduong-mwam commented on code in PR #35719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35719#discussion_r1405479106
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/taskInstance/Xcom/index.tsx:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*!
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477319
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#discussion_r1405477686
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/dagRun/MarkRunAs.tsx:
##
@@ -58,42 +65,115 @@ const MarkRunAs = ({ runId, state, ...otherProps }: Props)
=> {
markSu
potiuk commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826902225
> You are converting from one format to another. This is effectively
serialization. This is why serde calls to serialize. By removing type
information and not including versioning you ca
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #35403:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35403#discussion_r1405480918
##
airflow/www/views.py:
##
@@ -3527,13 +3527,15 @@ def grid_data(self):
with create_session() as session:
query = select(DagRun).where(D
potiuk commented on PR #35871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35871#issuecomment-1826904276
> Really nice
Indeeed. Those "reproducible builds" - once we have good tooling - are
really powerful in making "secure" supply chain possible
--
This is an automated message fro
hussein-awala commented on code in PR #35871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35871#discussion_r1405482513
##
dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md:
##
@@ -667,6 +667,102 @@ docker run --rm --entrypoint "airflow" local/airflow info
docker image rm local/airflow
`
potiuk merged PR #35871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35871
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 162d0f00d4 Add reproducible build check step in the
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35873
Pre-commits often import some modules from elsewhere after inserting a
common folder at PYTHONPATH. Pre-commits are pretty special, because they are
supposed to be run as standalone scripts by pre-co
potiuk commented on PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#issuecomment-1826909513
I started to separate things out
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35873
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
jscheffl commented on code in PR #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830#discussion_r1405486136
##
scripts/ci/pre_commit/common_precommit_utils.py:
##
@@ -71,3 +80,74 @@ def get_directory_hash(directory: Path, skip_path_regexp:
str | None = None) ->
i
hduong-mwam commented on PR #35719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35719#issuecomment-1826912752
> I really _love_ the UI changes gradually migrating from legacy to new.
>
> When I tested locally I saw still the old link pointing to the old XCom
page in the second row of
hduong-mwam commented on code in PR #35719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35719#discussion_r1405490868
##
airflow/www/static/js/dag/details/taskInstance/Xcom/XcomEntry.tsx:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*!
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ *
bolkedebruin commented on PR #32319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319#issuecomment-1826915604
> > You are converting from one format to another. This is effectively
serialization. This is why serde calls to serialize. By removing type
information and not including versionin
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
