nathadfield commented on issue #37982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37982#issuecomment-1985300858
#37828 is all good from me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kosteev commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985334309
In perform_heartbeat, job.heartrate is used.
The issue is that for scheduler it is defined in SchedulerJobRunner
(previously was SchedulerJob):
https://github.com/apache/airf
kosteev commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985337125
About reproduction scenario:
"If heartbeat sec is greater than threshold, then yes you'd expect to see
the warning" - yes, but in the scenario you modify [scheduler]job_heartbeat
erikvatt commented on issue #33619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33619#issuecomment-1985350725
@cjames23 Have you started working on OpenSearch log integration?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
paramjeet01 commented on issue #37090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37090#issuecomment-1985362791
@dirrao , Can you please take a look into this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
sunank200 commented on code in PR #37826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37826#discussion_r1517481946
##
airflow/models/dag.py:
##
@@ -3115,6 +3119,8 @@ def bulk_write_to_db(
)
orm_dag.schedule_interval = dag.schedule_interval
Taragolis opened a new pull request, #37990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37990
This one is continuation of https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34168.
Validation happen independently of the Database Type and expects that the
task's priority_weight_total i
Taragolis closed pull request #37990: Validate tasks total priority weight in
DagBag
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37990
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
Author: eladkal
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:37:49 2024
New Revision: 67798
Log:
Release Airflow Providers on 2024-03-08
Added:
release/airflow/providers/apache_airflow_providers_amazon-8.19.0-py3-none-any.whl
- copied unchanged from r67797,
dev/airflow/providers/apache_airflow_providers_amazo
uranusjr commented on code in PR #37826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37826#discussion_r1517546336
##
airflow/models/dag.py:
##
@@ -3032,6 +3034,16 @@ def bulk_sync_to_db(
)
return cls.bulk_write_to_db(dags=dags, session=session)
+def simpl
phanikumv merged PR #37826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37826
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflo
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
phanikumv pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 08efc32fd1 Fix celery command deprecation message with right version
(#37926)
add 832d2f561a Add the dataset_e
eladkal merged PR #972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/972
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch add-documentation-2024-03-04
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
was ff359eb980 Add documentation for packages - 2024-03-04
The revisions that were on this b
eladkal opened a new pull request, #37991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37991
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-
eladkal commented on issue #37890:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985470350
Thank you everyone. Providers are released.
I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of
open issues can be found
[here](https://github.com/ap
eladkal closed issue #37890: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on
March 04, 2024
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985472529
> so, now this heartrate: int = conf.getint("scheduler",
"SCHEDULER_HEARTBEAT_SEC") from SchedulerJobRunner is not used anywhere
Indeed.
> "If heartbeat sec is greater
potiuk commented on issue #37090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37090#issuecomment-1985479855
Generally speaking the issue will be looked at someone when they pick
interest in fixing it - I think there is no reason to expect that particular
person will take a look at it eve
kosteev commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985504904
I will try to prepare a fix, but I do not want to commit to this, so that if
anyone wants to fix it.
I will try to work on it today, early next week.
--
This is an automated m
potiuk opened a new pull request, #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992
Sinc #34026 scheduler heartrate has not been properly calculated. We missed
the check for SchedulerJob type and setting heartrate value from
`scheduler_health_check_threshold`.
This PR fixes i
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985513790
I actualy took a quick look and it turned out that it was removed after
adding SchedulerJobRunner. The SchedulerJob check has been removed by #34026 a
bit later.
I prepared a
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985518074
Actually not even there
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985536704
@kosteev - are you sure it's affecting 2.6.3 Airflow ? from what I traced
#34026 has been only part of v2-8 branch. Maybe there was another reason before
in 2.6.3 - but quite certa
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985539571
The 2.6.3 version is:
```
def is_alive(self, grace_multiplier=2.1):
"""
Is this job currently alive.
We define alive as in a state
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985546310
Ahh.. those parameters are confusing and I am mixing them ... it is indeed
way older sorry (threshold mixed with secs)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
josix commented on issue #37449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37449#issuecomment-1985553064
I could help investigate it if there is no one working on this. Please feel
free to assign me, thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
dirrao commented on code in PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992#discussion_r1517618531
##
airflow/jobs/job.py:
##
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ def _merge_from(self, job: Job | JobPydantic | None):
def _heartrate(job_type: str) -> float:
if job_type
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new b2dd2dba48 Updating con
potiuk commented on code in PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992#discussion_r1517620372
##
airflow/jobs/job.py:
##
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ def _merge_from(self, job: Job | JobPydantic | None):
def _heartrate(job_type: str) -> float:
if job_type
potiuk commented on code in PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992#discussion_r1517621593
##
airflow/jobs/job.py:
##
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ def _merge_from(self, job: Job | JobPydantic | None):
def _heartrate(job_type: str) -> float:
if job_type
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985564821
Tracked it down (there were quite a few refactors) and indeed it was #30255
that introduced it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985565030
So it's there since 2.6.0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985565404
(just wanted to make sure how far back it goes)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
potiuk commented on PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992#issuecomment-1985565811
I actually tracked it down wrongly - it's there since 2.6.0 and
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30255
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
jscheffl commented on PR #37985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37985#issuecomment-1985583083
Oh, wow 12 approvals in <12h :-D
I found one glitch with the re-work, please do not merge (yet), need to fix
this in the afternoon so that the linkify is working again.
--
This is
kosteev commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985591616
I prepared a fix like this https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37993
But I see you have already fix (and implemented differently). Should I close
my PR?
--
This is an a
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985600389
Yeah - I think the way where it is closer to heartrate property is a bit
better and easier to reason about.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
kosteev closed pull request #37993: Fix bug with using
[scheduler]job_heartbeat_sec instead of [scheduler]scheduler_heartbeat_sec for
Airflow scheduler.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37993
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
potiuk commented on issue #37971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971#issuecomment-1985603095
We have a bit of a mess there - because the JOB
(scheduler/job_heartrabeat_sec) has been used and abused by different jobs, so
likely better to keep it in JOB.
--
This is an aut
potiuk commented on code in PR #37985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37985#discussion_r1517653733
##
airflow/www/jest.config.js:
##
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ const config = {
transformIgnorePatterns: [
`node_modules/(?!${[
// specify modules that needs to be
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #37994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37994
When missing [openlineage] section in airflow.cfg or some env variables, an
error was raised. We should avoid that and treat lack of configuration as empty
configuration.
T
dbrtly commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985618402
If cloud logging streamed the logs directly into the airflow gcs logs path,
would that be a pathway to seeing the logs in airflow?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
mobuchowski merged PR #37994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37994
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airf
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mobuchowski pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 832d2f561a Add the dataset_expression as part of DagModel and
DAGDetailSchema (#37826)
add ea5238a81b fix: A
potiuk commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985648227
> If cloud logging streamed the logs directly into the airflow gcs logs
path, would that be a pathway to seeing the logs in airflow?
No. GCS is object storage. It's not a stre
dbrtly commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985657810
I’m glossing over details of specific jargon.
Cloud run already streams logs to cloud logging.
I can see a directory in the cloud composer bucket for logs. If cloud
loggin
eladkal commented on PR #37821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37821#issuecomment-1985669385
OK now i get it.
the claim is that the changes were added in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37103 by mistake :)
This is why separating unrelated changes in PRs is so impor
eladkal commented on issue #33619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33619#issuecomment-1985675070
I think that https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34693 has most of the
needed logic for AWS integration it just require adjustments after the
OpenSearch provider was implemented
renanxx1 commented on issue #36920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36920#issuecomment-1985698998
I faced the same issue on Airflow 2.8.1.
The scheduler was skipping dags execution with the message: "DAG scheduling
was skipped, probably because the DAG record was locked"
potiuk merged PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk closed issue #37971: Scheduler uses [scheduler]job_heartbeat_sec
property for heartbeats instead of [scheduler]scheduler_heartbeat_sec
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37971
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from ea5238a81b fix: Add fallbacks when retrieving Airflow configuration to
avoid errors being raised (#37994)
add 01e
potiuk commented on code in PR #37992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37992#discussion_r1517721921
##
airflow/jobs/job.py:
##
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ def _merge_from(self, job: Job | JobPydantic | None):
def _heartrate(job_type: str) -> float:
if job_type
potiuk commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985727697
Well. if you find a way to create GCS objects (not stream to GCS - that is
impossible) after the job is complete, and you follow naming convention of
Airflow (which you have to be w
potiuk commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985742361
So maybe just to explain how logging works when REMOTE logging uses GCS -
because you might not be aware of it. GCS is an object storage and streaming to
it is impossible as mention
dbrtly commented on issue #36963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36963#issuecomment-1985746090
Thanks Jarek
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
rgelsi commented on issue #37966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37966#issuecomment-1985758515
The following error is displayed in the Browser Console:
```
response: "{\"error\": \"Can not provide filters when dag_run_id filter is
selected.\"}"
responseText: "{\"error
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new bcb4e6603a Update providers metadata 2024-03-08 (#3
potiuk merged PR #37991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37991
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk opened a new pull request, #37995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37995
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pul
vincbeck commented on issue #37982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37982#issuecomment-1985848574
Checked my change and it works as expected
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
potiuk commented on PR #37995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37995#issuecomment-1985853546
Ha... First incompatibility :) encountered.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
vincbeck commented on PR #37915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37915#issuecomment-1985863531
Hmmm, I can understand the MENU change looks unrelated. I can possibly split
the PR in 2 if that helps. I can also a unit test to cover the plugin path
--
This is an automated messag
dabla commented on PR #37821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37821#issuecomment-1985881678
> OK now i get it. the claim is that the changes were added in #37103 by
mistake :) This is why separating unrelated changes in PRs is so important it.
It would have been much easier to u
vincbeck commented on PR #37915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37915#issuecomment-1985892661
Actually, let me explain why I combined the two. The idea initially was to
call `is_authorized_custom_view`in this case:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/a
vincbeck commented on code in PR #37947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37947#discussion_r1517873411
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/auth_manager/views/auth.py:
##
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def login_callback(self):
user_id=attributes["id"][0],
gro
bbovenzi commented on issue #37966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37966#issuecomment-1985905459
That makes sense. If you have a dag run selected, we shouldn't let you
filter out your selection.
So either setting a filter clears your selection or filters are disabled
when
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517880761
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517880761
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517880761
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517892095
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
potiuk commented on PR #37995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37995#issuecomment-1985929554
Closing in favour of #37996
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk closed pull request #37995: Update to latest uv
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37995
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk opened a new pull request, #37996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37996
Until https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2302 is solved we should
disable UV upgrade check as 0.1.16 version of `uv` does not properly validate
our pyproject.toml with Draft PEP-0639 extension (l
vincbeck opened a new pull request, #37997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37997
I wrongly removed 2 methods in #37889. Adding them back. It makes fail any
auth manager but FAB. I'll add a test in a separate PR to catch it. The reason
why I dont add the test in this PR is:
-
vincbeck commented on code in PR #37947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37947#discussion_r1517901096
##
airflow/www/security_manager.py:
##
@@ -348,3 +348,9 @@ def _is_authorized_category_menu(self, category: str) ->
Callable:
self._get_auth_manager_i
vincbeck commented on code in PR #37947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37947#discussion_r1517910703
##
airflow/www/security_manager.py:
##
@@ -348,3 +348,9 @@ def _is_authorized_category_menu(self, category: str) ->
Callable:
self._get_auth_manager_i
dabla commented on issue #37890:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985950730
Maybe a bit late but I tested
[#37103](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37103) and I can confirm it
works :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
moiseenkov opened a new pull request, #37998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37998
PR introduces the optional `wait_job_until_complete` parameter for the
`KubernetesJobOperator` that blocks execution until the created job is complete.
The default value is `False` thus behavio
potiuk commented on issue #37890:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985985361
Never too late for good news :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
vincbeck commented on PR #37915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37915#issuecomment-1985982769
I also added a unit test that loads the index page. The difference with the
test being implemented in #37947, is this one is a unit test. No real API call
is made against AWS. This tes
vincbeck commented on PR #37997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37997#issuecomment-1985984976
Test implemented in #37915
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
JDarDagran commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517942728
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.Pyth
potiuk merged PR #37996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37996
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 66f28f2fc9 Disable `uv` upgrade checks temporarily
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517976751
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
mobuchowski commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517981734
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.Pyt
tatiana commented on code in PR #37725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37725#discussion_r1517976751
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ config:
example:
"airflow.operators.bash.BashOperator;airflow.operators.python.PythonO
nsAstro opened a new issue, #37999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37999
### Apache Airflow Provider(s)
elasticsearch
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
Latest version of the ElasticSearch provider
### Apache Airflow version
2.9 but all
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 3a034462ec Updating con
dstandish commented on PR #37855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37855#issuecomment-1986111612
@potiuk initially I was going to write a check that all pydantic models we
define can round trip. However, as yet some pydantic models do not have types
defined (as in DAT.THE_MODEL)
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new b3cd32f6d8 Add back methods in security manager (
vincbeck merged PR #37997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37997
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
eladkal commented on PR #37836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37836#issuecomment-1986128883
If we do this it must be consistent between CLI and API.
> I think there were related discussions in the past about how to treat a
paused DAG when it is triggered
I think t
ferruzzi commented on code in PR #37666:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37666#discussion_r1518053030
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/auth_manager/aws_auth_manager.py:
##
@@ -443,6 +443,62 @@ def batch_is_authorized_variable(
]
return self.avp_facad
potiuk opened a new pull request, #38000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38000
The regexp used to bump version of provider also matched
`excluded-python-versions` and did not allow to bump version of papermill.
Updated regexp only matches actual `versions:` key.
eladkal commented on issue #37999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37999#issuecomment-1986140122
cc @Owen-CH-Leung You contributed several elastic PRs in the past. Can you
assist with triaging this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
potiuk merged PR #38000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from b3cd32f6d8 Add back methods in security manager (#37997)
add c616cd307a Fix regexp used to bump version of provide
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
