This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 7622192441 Fix `ElasticsearchSQLHook` fails with `AttributeError:
__enter__` (#41537)
add e92cf81805 Fix `AwsTas
eladkal closed issue #40875: EcsRunTaskOperator log output in UI does not
contain all events
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40875
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
eladkal merged PR #41515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41515
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.
geraj1010 commented on code in PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#discussion_r1720610991
##
airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py:
##
@@ -116,6 +126,8 @@ def __init__(
networks: list[str | types.NetworkAttachmentConfig] | None = No
geraj1010 commented on PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#issuecomment-2294633490
@Lee-W
I have added two unit tests for checking if `logging_driver` works and for
entering an invalid/unsupported `logging_driver` value.
--
This is an automated message from th
geraj1010 commented on code in PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#discussion_r1720610991
##
airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py:
##
@@ -116,6 +126,8 @@ def __init__(
networks: list[str | types.NetworkAttachmentConfig] | None = No
bmoon4 commented on issue #29897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/29897#issuecomment-2294622876
Been observing this issue for long time ... and my team ended up building a
dashboard(Grafana) which uses Airflow API calls to get import error data.
--
This is an automated mess
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 8c2f56375a Skip task in example_dynamodb_to_s3.py (#41546)
add 7622192441 Fix `ElasticsearchSQLHook` fails with `
eladkal closed issue #41486: ElasticsearchSQLHook fails with AttributeError:
__enter__
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41486
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
eladkal merged PR #41537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41537
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.
topherinternational commented on issue #21004:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21004#issuecomment-2294614693
@uranusjr @potiuk I took a look at this as a good-first-issue, and I think
there's a PMC-level question to be answered before I want to start writing any
code.
T
joaopamaral opened a new pull request, #41549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41549
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rs
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41548:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41548#issuecomment-2294591349
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contributors'
morokosi opened a new pull request, #41548:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41548
The papermill provider was previously excluded from releasing a version
compatible with Python 3.12 due to version compatibility issues with the
aiohttp dependency. However, papermi
fredthomsen commented on issue #39390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39390#issuecomment-2294514118
@kiaradlf yes that is correct. If that is your use case then
`map_index_template` will not help you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #39897: Add possibility to override the
conn type for Druid
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39897
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #40421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40421#issuecomment-2294473295
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #39837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39837#issuecomment-2294473357
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
howardyoo commented on code in PR #40802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40802#discussion_r1720477207
##
airflow/executors/base_executor.py:
##
@@ -302,15 +319,40 @@ def trigger_tasks(self, open_slots: int) -> None:
if key in self.attempts:
gopidesupavan commented on issue #41498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41498#issuecomment-2294438830
Hi @rawwar i have tried the steps you have mentioned from my local, but not
been able to re produce the issue, in my case its getting succeeded. is there
any other informatio
joaopamaral commented on issue #41540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540#issuecomment-2294409786
FYI, the error is that we are changing the access_control format (to include
the resource name) in airflow 2.10, but old FAB version doesn't know how to
handle it. I'll include
ashb commented on code in PR #40802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40802#discussion_r1720411361
##
airflow/executors/base_executor.py:
##
@@ -302,15 +319,40 @@ def trigger_tasks(self, open_slots: int) -> None:
if key in self.attempts:
joaopamaral commented on issue #41540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540#issuecomment-2294361453
Hey @FelipeRamos-neuro, can you confirm if this error vanishes if you
navigate to a different link and back to dags? E.g try to go to dataset and
navigate back to the dags?
joaopamaral commented on issue #41540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540#issuecomment-2294349121
Hey @FelipeRamos-neuro, I was able to reproduce the error. I'll open the PR
to fix it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
potiuk merged PR #41546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41546
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8c2f56375a Skip task in example_dynamodb_to_s3.py (
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-10
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-10 by this push:
new 89843b3313 Updating con
jscheffl commented on code in PR #41516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41516#discussion_r1720260008
##
airflow/www/static/js/components/RenderedJsonField.tsx:
##
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ const JsonParse = (content: string | object) => {
contentJson = content;
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch v2-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-10-test by this push:
new e36e521dcb Fix Non-DB test calculation
potiuk merged PR #41543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41543
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
anthony-joyce opened a new issue, #41547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41547
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.10
### What happened?
After upgrad
ferruzzi commented on code in PR #41304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41304#discussion_r1720242191
##
tests/system/providers/amazon/aws/example_dynamodb_to_s3.py:
##
@@ -195,7 +225,8 @@ def delete_dynamodb_table(table_name: str):
backup_db_segment_1,
ferruzzi commented on code in PR #41304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41304#discussion_r1720240078
##
tests/system/providers/amazon/aws/example_dynamodb_to_s3.py:
##
@@ -162,18 +171,39 @@ def delete_dynamodb_table(table_name: str):
# [END howto_transfer_dynam
jscheffl commented on PR #41067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41067#issuecomment-2294028892
> > Yeah. This is a concern. Should we have a branch called v2-dev where all
airflow 2 PRs will go into, then the release manager would cherry-pick to
v2-10-test when releasing? I thin
ferruzzi opened a new pull request, #41546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41546
`backup_db_to_point_in_time_incremental_export` requires at least a
15-minute window of available data, causing the system tests to fail. Moving
it into a branching task group will let us keep the
fritz-astronomer opened a new pull request, #41545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41545
Adding `*SlackOperator` to perform specific, common, API actions
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://gith
tchakib commented on PR #39159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39159#issuecomment-2294005048
Hello @ephraimbuddy,
Can we know the reason for postponing this future version to 2.11 instead of
2.10?”
I’m asking because we’re eagerly awaiting this future version in order
potiuk commented on PR #41122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41122#issuecomment-2293987742
You need to rebase/run pre-commit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
potiuk closed issue #41542: Add Backfill Button to DAGs Overview and Individual
DAG Pages in the Webserver UI
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41542
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
potiuk commented on issue #41542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41542#issuecomment-2293947151
This is far more than addinga "button". This is planned for Airflow 3 and
the whole Airlfow Improvement Proposal about how to implement it
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa
potiuk commented on PR #41543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41543#issuecomment-2293944034
BAckporting pytest8 workaroud to v2-10-test
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41543
Pytest has a weird behaviour that it will not collect tests from parent
folder when subfolder of it is specified after the parent folder. This caused
some non-db tests from providers folder have been
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch v2-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-10-test by this push:
new fa4ee68da1 Fix failing pydantic v1 test
potiuk merged PR #41541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41541
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
pedro-cf opened a new issue, #41542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41542
### Description
This feature request proposes the addition of a "Backfill" button to the
Apache Airflow webserver UI, both on the DAGs overview page and within
individual DAG pages. This button w
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41541
We need to exclude some versions of Pydantic v1 because it conflicts with
aws provider.
(cherry picked from commit a033c5f15a033c751419506ea77ffdbacdd37705)
-
potiuk commented on PR #41329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41329#issuecomment-2293889509
IF I am not mistaken - this one also adds timeout in supervising process.
Was that intentional ? (the commint message only mentions adding
SIGHUP/SIGTERM) ?
--
This is an automated me
eladkal commented on code in PR #40936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40936#discussion_r1720119586
##
newsfragments/40936.bugfix.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Fix ``on_success_callback`` will not run if task is skipped.
Review Comment:
We need more details here. It do
eladkal commented on PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#issuecomment-2293878954
> Note: I haven’t worked on tests or docs yet, I’ll proceed with those once
we’re happy with the implementation.
If now you belive we need both then what I am looking for is how t
potiuk merged PR #40931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40931
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk merged PR #41527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41527
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
vincbeck merged PR #41434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41434
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
potiuk commented on PR #41067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41067#issuecomment-2293830073
> Yeah. This is a concern. Should we have a branch called v2-dev where all
airflow 2 PRs will go into, then the release manager would cherry-pick to
v2-10-test when releasing? I think th
potiuk commented on PR #40703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40703#issuecomment-2293813085
I think that one caused problem
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540#issuecomment-2293802672 - it
does not seem backwards-compatible with the previous fab provider.
--
This
FelipeRamos-neuro commented on issue #41540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540#issuecomment-2293802672
Some prints I forgot to add to the issue
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch v2-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-10-test by this push:
new 30cfb7345a Incorrect try number subtrac
potiuk merged PR #41535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41535
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
eladkal commented on PR #30531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30531#issuecomment-2293767340
@hussein-awala i think now that main branch is Airflow 3 this PR should be
easier
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
FelipeRamos-neuro opened a new issue, #41540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41540
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.10.0
### What happened?
After
vincbeck commented on PR #41434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41434#issuecomment-2293763491
All green :) Any additional reviews?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ephraimbuddy commented on PR #41535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41535#issuecomment-2293763606
> cc: @utkarsharma2 @kaxil @ephraimbuddy -> should we mark both PRs with
"Milestone 2.10.1" - the one in main and the backport one? WDYT?
I think only the backport is enough
Owen-CH-Leung commented on PR #41537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41537#issuecomment-2293756831
I think the 3 failing tests are `Tests / Basic tests / Test Airflow release
commands` , `Tests / Provider checks / Provider packages sdist build and
install` , `Tests / Integratio
dirrao opened a new pull request, #41539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41539
smtp email user and password deprecated config removal
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41536#discussion_r1720018237
##
newsfragments/41536.significant.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+**Breaking Change**
+
+The ``get_conn_uri`` method has been removed from the ``AzureKeyVaultBackend
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#discussion_r1720012373
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/athena.py:
##
@@ -126,63 +130,97 @@ def execute(self, context: Context) -> str | None:
self.query_execution_c
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41536#discussion_r1720008280
##
newsfragments/41536.significant.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+**Breaking Change**
+
+The ``get_conn_uri`` method has been removed from the ``AzureKeyVaultBackend
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#discussion_r1720006098
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/athena.py:
##
@@ -126,63 +130,97 @@ def execute(self, context: Context) -> str | None:
self.query_execution_c
potiuk commented on issue #41525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41525#issuecomment-2293719334
> @potiuk what steps need to be followed for us to deprecate these old
hybrid executors for airflow 3.0? Or is that not possible because they are in
provider packages
We can
potiuk commented on PR #41437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41437#issuecomment-2293710232
Likely side-effect of other tests that have been somewhat masked or avoided
before the change - where some setup/teardown removed the side-effect.
You can reproduce the set of test
vincbeck commented on code in PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#discussion_r1719988542
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/athena.py:
##
@@ -126,63 +130,97 @@ def execute(self, context: Context) -> str | None:
self.query_execution_contex
eladkal commented on code in PR #41536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41536#discussion_r1719984678
##
newsfragments/41536.significant.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+**Breaking Change**
+
+The ``get_conn_uri`` method has been removed from the ``AzureKeyVaultBackend``
cl
o-nikolas commented on issue #41525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41525#issuecomment-2293700446
I'll look into fixing this issue But I encourage folks to use Multiple
Executor Configuration instead of these old (and should be deprecated) hybrid
executors. These are exactly
ephraimbuddy commented on PR #41067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41067#issuecomment-2293698324
> > @potiuk good to merge or still hold this back?
>
> I am struggling with it a bit - because it will likely make it more
difficult for contributors to add their tests to ma
eladkal commented on PR #41537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41537#issuecomment-2293694267
Static checks are failing :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 17d4fb2294 Updating con
kaxil commented on issue #41532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41532#issuecomment-2293682944
I like your proposed solution @peter-gergely-horvath , would you like to
help out with the PR? Might just be a change in this file:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#discussion_r1719969696
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/athena.py:
##
@@ -126,63 +130,97 @@ def execute(self, context: Context) -> str | None:
self.query_execution_c
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #41511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41511#discussion_r1719969696
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/athena.py:
##
@@ -126,63 +130,97 @@ def execute(self, context: Context) -> str | None:
self.query_execution_c
potiuk commented on PR #41067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41067#issuecomment-2293668414
> @potiuk good to merge or still hold this back?
I am struggling with it a bit - because it will likely make it more
difficult for contributors to add their tests to main - while w
romsharon98 commented on issue #41526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41526#issuecomment-2293656275
The behavior is as expected.
It start a new DagRun because the default max_active_runs is 16.
But it does not start the first task until the first and second task don't
fi
potiuk commented on PR #41535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41535#issuecomment-2293648020
cc: @utkarsharma2 @kaxil @ephraimbuddy -> should we mark both PRs with
"Milestone 2.10" - the one in main and the backport one? WDYT?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
geraj1010 commented on code in PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#discussion_r1719940960
##
airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py:
##
@@ -116,6 +126,8 @@ def __init__(
networks: list[str | types.NetworkAttachmentConfig] | None = No
Owen-CH-Leung opened a new pull request, #41537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41537
Fixes #41486
The current `ElasticsearchSQLHook` is not working since it is still using
`elasticsearch-dbapi` which has already been deprecated last year. This PR
fixes the issue by add
geraj1010 commented on PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#issuecomment-2293616313
@Lee-W I'm not quite sure what kind of unit tests would be valid here, since
this is an operator update. The operator doesn't return anything to check. I do
have a test DAG if that co
geraj1010 commented on code in PR #41416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41416#discussion_r1719920651
##
airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py:
##
@@ -116,6 +126,8 @@ def __init__(
networks: list[str | types.NetworkAttachmentConfig] | None = No
potiuk commented on issue #41525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41525#issuecomment-2293586004
CC: @o-nikolas -> seems to be result of #40017
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
mszpot-future-processing commented on issue #41306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41306#issuecomment-2293567440
@Lee-W - working solution in below post:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78842962/airflow-dag-throws-gluejoboperator-is-not-json-serializable
It was a
salam-abdul commented on issue #41525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41525#issuecomment-2293562045
I'm getting a related error message on Airflow 2.10 and Python 3.11
`AttributeError: 'LocalKubernetesExecutor' object has no attribute
'slots_occupied'`
--
This is an auto
potiuk merged PR #41496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41496
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new e35ae2db7c Airflow 3: airflow date utils date_range
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 6ba2658aef Util helper deprecated functions remova
potiuk merged PR #41520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41520
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
kacpermuda commented on code in PR #41482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41482#discussion_r1719869241
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/extractors/manager.py:
##
@@ -105,14 +106,25 @@ def extract_metadata(self, dagrun, task, complete: bool =
False, task_instance=N
gopidesupavan opened a new pull request, #41536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41536
Removed deprecated parameters from AzureKeyVaultBackend
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apach
howardyoo commented on issue #37628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37628#issuecomment-2293498396
Hi folks! As part of the items raised during the discussion in dev mailing
list, I updated the document for this issue to further clarify what is the
requirements and reasons beh
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41535
…irflow (issue #41501) (#41502)
* Fix for issue #39336
* removed unnecessary import
(cherry picked from commit dd3c3a7a43102c967d76cdcfe1f2f8ebeef4e212)
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new dd3c3a7a43 Incorrect try number subtraction produci
potiuk merged PR #41502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41502
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
potiuk commented on PR #41502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41502#issuecomment-2293492313
> I wonder if this is related to the recent(-ish) try semantic changes?
Yep. It's in the description - result of #39336
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
potiuk closed issue #41501: Incorrect try number producing invalid span id for
OTEL airflow
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41501
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
