potiuk commented on code in PR #41961:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41961#discussion_r1741529552
##
performance/src/performance_dags/elastic_dag/elastic_dag.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+"""
+Elastic dag copied from apache/airflow master and adjusted to work on python
potiuk commented on code in PR #41961:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41961#discussion_r1741529923
##
performance/src/performance_dags/elastic_dag/elastic_dag.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+"""
+Elastic dag copied from apache/airflow master and adjusted to work on python
potiuk commented on code in PR #41961:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41961#discussion_r1741532812
##
performance/src/performance_dags/elastic_dag/elastic_dag.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+"""
+Elastic dag copied from apache/airflow master and adjusted to work on python
potiuk commented on PR #41961:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41961#issuecomment-2325754744
I thnk it also needs a bit cleanup for outdated stuff - generally
modernising the code and see what can be reused from plain Airflow 2
perspective.
Also possibly we should renama
potiuk commented on PR #39165:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39165#issuecomment-2325801888
I attempted to solve conflict - but It needs more static check fixes @molcay
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
miroslav-trifonov opened a new issue, #41972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41972
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.7.2
### What happened?
We are
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #41972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41972#issuecomment-2325805020
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for ap
pierrejeambrun commented on PR #41957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41957#issuecomment-2325806974
[bugraoz93](https://github.com/bugraoz93) I would that the initial idea is
to just migrate existing endpoints to the new API (FastAPI), modifying only
endpoints if necessary so w
dabla commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325846487
> Hey @dabla -> you need to also upgrade `common.sql` version in their
provider.yaml - otherwise PROD image build is not able to find common.sql >=
1.17.0.dev0
>
> The build is sma
potiuk commented on PR #41957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41957#issuecomment-2325847567
> I'll write the documentation down, If we are happy with it and agree with
the general strategy I can present it to the rest of the community. (This
thurday if I manage to do it before
potiuk commented on PR #41957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41957#issuecomment-2325848950
And even if we have no write-up - we can just intiate the discussion and
outline the idea this Thursday
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
dabla commented on PR #41327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41327#issuecomment-2325860567
@eladkal and @potiuk what do you think about this implementation? I would
ideally want to use entry points to register the dialects, so that additional
dialects can be loaded through dif
dabla commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325870292
> Hey @dabla -> you need to also upgrade `common.sql` version in their
provider.yaml - otherwise PROD image build is not able to find common.sql >=
1.17.0.dev0
>
> The build is sma
gaurav7261 commented on PR #41412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41412#issuecomment-2325875691
@Lee-W currently we are checking in root state_message only, should we also
check `error` key in every fail task array as well ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
potiuk commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325882466
Just add version in the provider.yaml. all the rest should happen by
pre-commits
You might want to add a line at top of changelog explaining better what was
added in common.sql (
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#discussion_r1741637062
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/utils/projects_google_spreadsheet.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
hadarsharon commented on issue #41891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41891#issuecomment-2325901918
I just checked and can confirm that this issue is resolved in
[v2.10.1.rc1](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-airflow/2.10.1.rc1)
Cheers
--
This is an automated mess
hadarsharon commented on issue #41956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41956#issuecomment-2325901266
Yes @potiuk I just checked and can confirm that #41891 is resolved in
[v2.10.1.rc1](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-airflow/2.10.1.rc1)
Cheers
--
This is an automa
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#discussion_r1741646923
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/utils/projects_google_spreadsheet.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#discussion_r1741646923
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/utils/projects_google_spreadsheet.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
pierrejeambrun merged PR #41957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41957
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pierrejeambrun pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f84d16e6fc Add views tests (#41957)
f84d16e
potiuk commented on code in PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#discussion_r1741657117
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/utils/projects_google_spreadsheet.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more co
molcay commented on PR #39165:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39165#issuecomment-2325918859
Hi @potiuk,
Thank you for the attempt. I will have a look ASAP
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
potiuk commented on code in PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#discussion_r1741661126
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/utils/projects_google_spreadsheet.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more co
potiuk commented on PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930#issuecomment-2325928503
> Glad to see SBOMs are getting some great improvement
Indeed. With thos changes we are getting to the next level - from just
"reporting as things are" to "makins some actionable s
dabla commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325957958
> Just add version in the provider.yaml. all the rest should happen by
pre-commits
>
> You might want to add a line at top of changelog explaining better what
was added in common.s
uranusjr commented on code in PR #41384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41384#discussion_r1741682178
##
tests/models/test_taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -5312,3 +5312,65 @@ def
test_swallow_mini_scheduler_exceptions(_schedule_downstream_mock, create_tas
ti.schedule_do
potiuk commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325977332
> Nice, ok thank you @potiuk , wanted to make sure before bumping the
version, will add a comment line in top of file explaining what was changed,
always better to document anyway and go
dabla commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2325986475
> > Nice, ok thank you @potiuk , wanted to make sure before bumping the
version, will add a comment line in top of file explaining what was changed,
always better to document anyway and g
potiuk merged PR #41930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41930
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from f84d16e6fc Add views tests (#41957)
add c3cabc1305 Move projects metadata for SBOM export to Google
Spreadsheet (
BasPH commented on PR #41639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41639#issuecomment-2326020217
Looks okay to me, although there's quite a lot of code duplication between
the `_get_aad_token_for_default_az_credential` and `_a
_get_aad_token_for_default_az_credential` methods. Any wa
poorvirohidekar commented on issue #40672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40672#issuecomment-2326027591
@YuvaPhani27 - Yes, I did some analysis and will test my changes in the next
day or two.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
potiuk commented on PR #40751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40751#issuecomment-2326034038
> If it causes issues, I can revert it as I added this in a dedicated commit.
We will see and RM can modify it on-line. How it works is that it simply
updates the changelog locally
legmac opened a new pull request, #41973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41973
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pul
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41973#issuecomment-2326116267
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contributors'
hussein-awala closed pull request #41973: V3.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41973
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits
hussein-awala commented on PR #41973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41973#issuecomment-2326127962
If you're trying to test something, you can create a PR in your fork.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
flypenguin opened a new pull request, #41974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41974
Using the **helm chart** I was unable to get SSH-based git sync to run.
Debugging lead to two issues:
- The secret is mounted as `root`, with permissions `0660`, which makes it
unreadable
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41974#issuecomment-2326129484
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contributors'
potiuk commented on PR #41327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41327#issuecomment-2326136008
We actually already use entrypoints - the provider.yaml "subset" is already
exposed in providers and various provider's capabilities are available this
way. They are even automatically e
dabla commented on PR #41331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41331#issuecomment-2326159383
> You will need to make some tests db -tests and apparently `power-bi`
connection is not created in older versions of airlfow (why would they be - so
some test compat code should be added
dabla commented on PR #41331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41331#issuecomment-2326161561
@potiuk I would also like to have this PR merged for the next providers
release as this fixes also fixes proxy issue with PowerBIDatasetRefreshOperator
and allows custom api versions to b
dabla commented on PR #35591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35591#issuecomment-2326207394
@potiuk Maybe we can merge this one for Airflow 3.0.0 ? Ofc dunno what the
implications will be regarding UI as it will not be FAB anymore, but I'm
willing to help there also if needed.
phi-friday commented on code in PR #41832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41832#discussion_r1741866840
##
tests/utils/test_decorators.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. Se
nathadfield commented on issue #41833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41833#issuecomment-2326253115
Without a reproducible example or, at the very least more information and
context, I doubt you are going to get much help on this one because this is not
a known problem or any
dirrao opened a new pull request, #41975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41975
Metrics basic deprecated validators (AllowListValidator and
BlockListValidator) removed in favor of pattern matching
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
VladaZakharova opened a new issue, #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976
### Description
The following DAG:
```
import datetime
import time
import airflow
from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator
time.sleep(1000)
with ai
VladaZakharova commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326283548
@potiuk @uranusjr @Taragolis
Hi all! This is another ticket for improving our Airflow UI :)
Need your advice before implementing this, do you have any ideas? Thanks!
potiuk commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326309995
Yeah - since we have `ParseImportError` -> it should likely be passed same
way. But maybe it already is? I know there is a problem with visibility of
ImportErrors when DAG has acces
vatsrahul1001 opened a new issue, #41977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41977
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.10.1.RC1
### What happened?
Noticed Triggered DAG button looks
dabla commented on PR #41327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41327#issuecomment-2326411953
> We actually already use entrypoints - the `provider.yaml` "subset" is
already exposed in providers and various provider's capabilities are available
this way. They are even automaticall
vatsrahul1001 commented on issue #41956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41956#issuecomment-2326419319
Noticed [issue](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41977) while using
TriggerDagRunOperator
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
raphaelauv commented on issue #41977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41977#issuecomment-2326428418
I have the problem with 2.10.0 and it was also the case in 2.9.X
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/370027ee-3526-4f97-9ac6-ca57da62522e)
--
This i
VladaZakharova commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326432524
Yes, looks very similar. But i think that problem cannot be resolved easily
(for some reasons haha), so i can try to at least catch this kind of errors
with AirflowTaskTimeo
vatsrahul1001 commented on issue #41977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41977#issuecomment-2326437493
I did not notice this issue in our deployment with 2.10.0
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a0cc252-4683-4a21-869e-35f6d805d7a7)
--
This is an aut
potiuk commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326531289
> Yes, looks very similar. But i think that problem cannot be resolved
easily (for some reasons haha), so i can try to at least catch this kind of
errors with AirflowTaskTimeout and
potiuk commented on PR #41327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41327#issuecomment-2326559107
I think in mssql provider, we do have a few "loosely related" things in
providers already and cross-provider dependencies (both explicit and implicit)
and sometimes where things are "be
joaopamaral commented on issue #41956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41956#issuecomment-2326596343
Tested https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41809 with the following FAB
version:
- 1.2.2: permissions are synced correctly with the old access control format.
- 1.3.0:
potiuk commented on PR #41899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41899#issuecomment-2326603613
cc: @howardyoo @ferruzzi ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
notatallshaw-gts commented on issue #33692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33692#issuecomment-2326652700
Still an issue, I just have yet not managed to prioritize raising a PR 🙁
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
potiuk commented on issue #33692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33692#issuecomment-2326677110
Maybe someone can step up :) ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #41977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41977#issuecomment-2326683152
> I have the problem with 2.10.0 and it was also the case in 2.9.X
>
>
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/10202690/363986114-c98c16ad-2a0c-4721-b
potiuk closed issue #41833: Airflow DAG run missing on few days
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41833
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscri
dabla commented on PR #41327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41327#issuecomment-2326753141
> I think in mssql provider, we do have a few "loosely related" things in
providers already and cross-provider dependencies (both explicit and implicit)
and sometimes where things are "be
VladaZakharova commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326781843
Actually, as i have checked my problem is a little bit different from what
you have mentioned: in the #29897 i can see that for Admin user ImportError can
be visible on UI (
potiuk commented on issue #41976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976#issuecomment-2326821753
Yeah - so likely creating a ParseImportError speciffically when there is a
timeout should help :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
potiuk commented on PR #41331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41331#issuecomment-2326824353
Tests failing though
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
RNHTTR opened a new issue, #41979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41979
### Apache Airflow version
2.10.0
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
When top-level DAG code causes a DagBag import tim
iamtodor-fb commented on issue #41772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41772#issuecomment-232686
@potiuk seems like my mentioned work-around didn't work for me cause
bigquery adjusts the timezone, so the timezone has to be explicitly provided.
We managed to provide it as f
MRLab12 closed pull request #41627: Implement `on_killed` support for tasks
during DAG run timeout
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41627
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
seyoon-lim commented on code in PR #40757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40757#discussion_r1742312400
##
airflow/providers/apache/spark/hooks/spark_submit.py:
##
@@ -282,10 +313,57 @@ def _resolve_connection(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
def get_conn(self) -> Any:
seyoon-lim commented on code in PR #40757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40757#discussion_r1742312863
##
airflow/providers/apache/spark/hooks/spark_submit.py:
##
@@ -282,10 +313,57 @@ def _resolve_connection(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
def get_conn(self) -> Any:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 721178c811 Updating con
dstandish commented on PR #39760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39760#issuecomment-2326957871
related
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38914
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39745
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
dstandish commented on issue #39680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39680#issuecomment-2326958977
related
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38914
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39745
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
dstandish commented on PR #39745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39745#issuecomment-2326961978
related
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38914
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39760
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39680
https://github.com/apache/ai
jeremiahishere commented on issue #41894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41894#issuecomment-2326974576
It is failing in test for us. Production is not failing because the dag
execution dates are based on the current time. It started failing when
upgrading from airflow 2.6 t
jeremiahishere commented on issue #41894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41894#issuecomment-2326995284
Is there an official way to clean the database between tests? I found this
cleanup dag:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v2-10-stable/airflow/utils/db_cleanup.py.
I
potiuk commented on issue #41979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41979#issuecomment-2327026545
Duplicate of https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41976
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
potiuk closed issue #41979: DagBag import timeout errors not propagating to
Airflow UI
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41979
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
potiuk commented on issue #41979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41979#issuecomment-2327026973
Closing as duplicate
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
potiuk commented on issue #41894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41894#issuecomment-2327051114
I do not know too much about the root cause, but let me post some things
that might help you to straighten things out:
* 'airflow db reset` will reset the database. I believe
potiuk commented on issue #41894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41894#issuecomment-2327052731
Also converting it into discussion. This is not "airflow issue" per se - I
doubt we will be able to make a PR from it that will `fix` something - it's
more of possibly troubleshooti
potiuk closed issue #41894: Rerunning a dag in Airflow 2.7.3 causes a missing
table issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41894
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
nevcohen commented on code in PR #40757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40757#discussion_r1742450126
##
airflow/providers/apache/spark/hooks/spark_submit.py:
##
@@ -282,10 +313,57 @@ def _resolve_connection(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
def get_conn(self) -> Any:
nevcohen commented on code in PR #40757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40757#discussion_r1742450532
##
airflow/providers/apache/spark/hooks/spark_submit.py:
##
@@ -282,10 +313,57 @@ def _resolve_connection(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
def get_conn(self) -> Any:
howardyoo commented on PR #41899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41899#issuecomment-2327173389
> cc: @howardyoo @ferruzzi ?
The change looks good to me. Thanks for adding these missing attributes to
the span :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
Illumaria commented on PR #41916:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41916#issuecomment-2327205062
Whoops... Sorry. 🙏🏻
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comme
jkramer-ginkgo opened a new issue, #41981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41981
### Apache Airflow version
2.10.0
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
Non-JSON values are broken in the Xcom UI
johnhoran commented on PR #41868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41868#issuecomment-2327219191
> Can you please fix the failing tests?
@RNHTTR all resolved now, I've also added a test case which would have
failed if the failure status wasn't handled.
--
This is an
ferruzzi commented on code in PR #41975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41975#discussion_r1742570262
##
airflow/metrics/validators.py:
##
@@ -118,7 +106,7 @@ def get_validator() -> ListValidator:
else:
list_type = DEFAULT_VALIDATOR_TYPE
-return v
potiuk merged PR #41954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41954
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch v2-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-10-test by this push:
new 7f49cfc06b Skip database isolation case
ferruzzi commented on code in PR #41975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41975#discussion_r1742580638
##
tests/core/test_stats.py:
##
@@ -345,76 +326,48 @@ def test_regex_matches(self, match_pattern, expect_incr):
statsd_client.assert_not_called()
-c
ferruzzi merged PR #41899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41899
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ferruzzi pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 0a816c6f0b Correct scheduled slots documentation
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41899#issuecomment-2327285987
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to
check our [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues) for
additional contributions.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-10
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-10 by this push:
new ef84517159 Updating con
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo