potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-991967998
Agree. Sounds like a hack. I also thought about it and it's actually kinda
misleading to use `/` for different purposes in a URL. Also if we use %2F, its
none better.
Good e
potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-990198956
Thanks @uranusjr @andrewgodwin. TIL.
I believe (WDYT) the best way to "fix" it is to warn peeople (and deprecate)
the use of "/" in the ID and explain that they won't be able
potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-989657584
Bummer
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-989206485
Yep. It definitely should
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-986738954
Agreee. The %2F is the only "good" way to go. And if it does not work - I
think we should probably fix it. This might become handdy when we add
multi-tenancy. "/" seems to be for ex
