[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #8793: Expose option: look_for_keys in ssh_hook via extras

2020-06-27 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on pull request #8793: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8793#issuecomment-650526549 And a test with "look_for_keys" = False would be nice as well. This is an automated message from the Apache Git S

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #8793: Expose option: look_for_keys in ssh_hook via extras

2020-06-28 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on pull request #8793: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8793#issuecomment-650828275 Looks good! Sometimes it happens indeed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #8793: Expose option: look_for_keys in ssh_hook via extras

2020-06-28 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on pull request #8793: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8793#issuecomment-650828320 Thanks @r-richmond ! This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #8793: Expose option: look_for_keys in ssh_hook via extras

2020-06-28 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on pull request #8793: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8793#issuecomment-650958880 No. We can release.it independently now. As of last week we have backport packages that allow anyone to use 2.0 operators in 1.10. and we can release each backport provider separ