github-actions[bot] commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1955456558
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] closed issue #37042: Dag grouping
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1939829382
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
potiuk commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1914536959
Just as a good example and showing how it can be done - here is a great
article (published today) of on of our users who contributed something they
needed. A Journey from the User t
potiuk commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1914532515
Airlfow does not have any "per dag" enforcement. It works pretty much
exclusively on "task" level. Scheduling is not based on DAGs it's based on
task. Schedulers look at tasks and p
MatthewStrickland commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1914203949
> Could you use a [cluster DAG
policy](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/administration-and-deployment/cluster-policies.html#)?
You can add the desire
RNHTTR commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1913636521
Could you use a [cluster DAG
policy](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/administration-and-deployment/cluster-policies.html#)?
You can add the desired DAGs into a
MatthewStrickland commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1913515530
> Just for curiosity, did you try to create a pool for this scenario? I have
an issue based when i consume an API and hit the rate limit, pools are good to
manage this. A
mariotaddeucci commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1913293229
Just for curiosity, did you try to create a pool for this scenario?
I have an issue based when i consume an API and hit the rate limit, pools
are good to manage this.
A
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042#issuecomment-1913097414
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for ap
MatthewStrickland opened a new issue, #37042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37042
### Description
Support grouping dags, where a dag can be part of many groups, with a
configuration similar to max_active_runs across the whole group.
(I'm sure this must have bee
11 matches
Mail list logo
