Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-22 Thread via GitHub
eladkal commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2304350654 Thank you everyone. Providers are released. Provider `openlineage` is excluded and will followup with rc2 I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release,

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-22 Thread via GitHub
eladkal closed issue #41577: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-22 Thread via GitHub
eladkal commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2304051098 > I did not find any regression from 10.3.0 to 10.4.0rc1. Then it's not blocking the release. Feel free to raise PR to address the bugs you mentioned -- This is an autom

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-21 Thread via GitHub
perry2of5 commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2302739131 I did not find any regression from 10.3.0 to 10.4.0rc1. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-21 Thread via GitHub
eladkal commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2302718898 @perry2of5 there is only 1 question relevant here. Is there regression in `apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure` from `10.4.0rc1` to `10.3.0` ? All the rest is possible bugs th

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-21 Thread via GitHub
perry2of5 commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2302383194 41142 passes test, but: I did some more testing and multiple_outputs=True fails with 2.9.2 with microsoft-azure providers 10.1.2. This actually makes sense because the ope

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-20 Thread via GitHub
perry2of5 commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2299297335 41142 seems to fail with multiple_outputs=True which I'd never tested before. Will debug tonight. On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 06:19:08 AM PDT, Błażej Tecław ***@**

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-20 Thread via GitHub
BTeclaw commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2298843235 #41150 - Works as expected - unit test + functional check, details below: 1. Connection definition (different role and warehouse than is used on Operator definition) ![connec

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-20 Thread via GitHub
dirrao commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2298758340 Hi, https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41372 address the documentation changes. So, no functionality change. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-20 Thread via GitHub
ambika-garg commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2298672243 Hi, #40356 work as expected -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-20 Thread via GitHub
uzhastik commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2298464877 ydb provider works fine: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41303 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to Git

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
eladkal commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2298013178 @kacpermuda I will exclude openlineage from this release -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
joaopamaral commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2297347779 Tested https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40703 with both access_control formats and it's working fine: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ade62db-13cf-448c-

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
kacpermuda commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296804228 #41494 tried to fix the OOM error in the scheduler that the OpenLineage can cause when generating a dag_tree from a huge DAG (related issue: #41505). It works but we've just got

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
vikramaditya91 commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296695690 > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41256: @vikramaditya91 Works fine -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
Owen-CH-Leung commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296644731 @eladkal the `ElasticSearchSQLHook` is now working as expected. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6b94fd51-869f-43fd-9fbb-c5dfd2bc4eff) -- Thi

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
jx2lee commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296550520 @eladkal #40008 works fine! (unittest & example run) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
potiuk commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296307037 Checked that all my changes are in. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
potiuk commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296272842 > Hi, since there haven’t been any recent updates for the Teradata Provider beyond version 2.5.0, could you explain why a new release version is needed? According to our rules

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
phi-friday commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296167648 1. #41356 works fine. 2. #41358 I didn't use `spark` so I can't check, but given that `_sql` is simply an alias for `sql`, it should be fine. 3. #41461 I couldn't find a go

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
sc250072 commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296139664 Hi, since there haven’t been any recent updates for the Teradata Provider beyond version 2.5.0, could you explain why a new release version is needed? https://nam02.safelin

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
moiseenkov commented on issue #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577#issuecomment-2296096501 Hi, #41527, #41262 work as expected -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 19, 2024 [airflow]

2024-08-19 Thread via GitHub
eladkal opened a new issue, #41577: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41577 ### Body I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release. Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers? The guidelines on how t