[I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

eladkal opened a new issue, #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890 ### Body I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release. Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers? The guidelines on h

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

moiseenkov commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978430277 hi, #37282 works as expected -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

kacpermuda commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978510675 All the PR's for the `Provider openlineage: 1.6.0rc1` works as expected. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on t

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

Taragolis commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978626345 I've check my changes, most of them pretty simple. - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37138 in google Provider changes should be fixed by https://github.com/apache/ai

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

LudvigLundberg commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978861493 > I've check my changes, most of them pretty simple. > > * [Replace usage of `datetime.utcnow` and `datetime.utcfromtimestamp` in providers #37138](https://github.com/

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

vchiapaikeo commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978911428 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37711 looks good. Huge thank you to everyone that helped resolve this mini fire last week (Jarek, Andrey, Elad 🙇 ) -- This is an

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

arjunanan6 commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978915245 #34766 works as expected. :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

m1racoli commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1978935189 I can confirm #37486. Although I had to manually require `apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=8.0.0` for my DAG to parse. Before that I had version 7.14.0 installed a

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

moiseenkov commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1979039732 > I assume this is because of #36847. Are we missing a requirement for `apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=8.0.0` in the google provider's dependencies? @m1racoli

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

potiuk commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1980085707 All my changes are there :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the speci

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

pavansharma36 commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1980164708 Verified #36794 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

pankajastro commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1981251691 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37634 looks good. thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

eladkal commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985470350 Thank you everyone. Providers are released. I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found [here](https://github.com/ap

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

eladkal closed issue #37890: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

dabla commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985950730 Maybe a bit late but I tested [#37103](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37103) and I can confirm it works :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [I] Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 04, 2024 [airflow]

potiuk commented on issue #37890: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37890#issuecomment-1985985361 Never too late for good news :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the s