Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

Bowrna commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1913621853 @RNHTTR shall we close this issue after I fix the documentation? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

RNHTTR closed issue #35332: WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

Bowrna commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1913129539 yes it works the same way for both config. yeah, let me update the docs -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to Git

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

RNHTTR commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1912454616 Interesting... so this config works in either direction? For example `2,16` works exactly the same as `16,2`? If so, it might make sense to update the docs accordingly. -- This i

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

Bowrna commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1912134234 @RNHTTR @eladkal @Taragolis could you give me update about the above comment? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

Bowrna commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1876874115 @RNHTTR However we are going to configure the worker_autoscale, be it (max_concurrency, min_concurrency) or (min_concurrency, max_concurrency) or (single_concurrency_val), celery is

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

RNHTTR commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1874301402 Go for it! Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comme

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

Bowrna commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1873634703 Could i pick up this issue if it's still pending @RNHTTR ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

RNHTTR commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1791737455 Sure -- might take me ~1 week or so -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Re: [I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

eladkal commented on issue #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332#issuecomment-1791499158 @RNHTTR can you raise a PR for it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

[I] WORKER_AUTOSCALE should not allow max workers < min workers [airflow]

RNHTTR opened a new issue, #35332: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35332 ### Apache Airflow version Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below) ### What happened [This was reported for Airflow 2.5.3](https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CCQ7EGB1P/p1