boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1882544727
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for ap
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1882794935
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
gbonazzoli commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1884644808
@paramjeet01 Well said !!!
I also add that working with apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes on a
cluster kubernetes 1.28.x it seems to have logging capture problems d
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1884787127
@gbonazzoli
```
Otherall, the XComs examples in python do not work at all
```
it works on my side , could you please open a new issue with a reproducible
example , t
paramjeet01 commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1888622235
@raphaelauv , Thanks for the help. The above stated image for future release
?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
potiuk closed issue #36678: apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes requires
latest kubernetes version
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
gbonazzoli commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915131712
The issue is said to be closed but it seems that
`apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes 7.14.0` does not think so.
```
ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not curr
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915150429
close cause fix is merged , does not mean it was deploy in a new release
and `7.14.0` is 2 days old , It can't include a fix merged 30 minutes ago
--
This is an automat
paramjeet01 commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915158946
@raphaelauv When are we planning to release the new version ? or is it
automated by pipelines and we wait till then ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915166094
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues?q=is%3Aissue+Status+of+testing+Providers+is%3Aclosed+
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
potiuk commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915219666
We release our providers roughly every two weeks. Byut if you REALLY want
you can easily build your own provider packages we have instructions available
to do so - this way you co
paramjeet01 commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1919387348
Yeah , I can check that. Please send me the instructions also could this
issue [37090](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37090) be related to the
provider version
--
potiuk commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1919400430
Those are step-by-step instruction release manager does
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#prepare-regular-provider-packages-rc
just
potiuk commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1919407237
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37090 be related to the provider
version
Possibly. Generally there is not a single person who might remember or now
all the chages
14 matches
Mail list logo
