jscheffl closed pull request #35861: Add a migration script tooling support to
migrate off mssql
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jscheffl commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1872320271
Migrated script to https://github.com/apache/airflow-mssql-migration
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
ephraimbuddy commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1844873329
+1 to keep this separate from the Airflow repo considering the added
maintenance time it would cost and of course the CVE issues
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1829761337
>
> I see no problem with that. Mssql is considered experimental. We can
publish it under statement of best effort. In the mailing list thread one of
the comments was that we should
eladkal commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826833780
> making it part of our repository in general
I see no problem with that.
Mssql is considered experimental. We can publish it under statmant of best
effort.
In the mailing l
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826824513
And... Fantastic you are doing it ! Thanks for that!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
jscheffl commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826823839
Hi @potiuk Yes, maybe this is a mis-understanding. I did NOT want to make
this script a release piece. If we see we need it in other cases we _could_
leverage it.
So it is now i
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826819752
I wonder - what others think about it. Especially those who were in Airflow
when we migrated to Airflow 2. from 1.10.15.
And just to add a bit more context. We did release
https:/
potiuk commented on PR #35861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35861#issuecomment-1826815324
I am not going to block it in this form - but - as explained in a number of
messages - I have a huge concern about
a) making it part of official airflow tooling
b) making it p
