potiuk commented on PR #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258#issuecomment-1785179218
> hat other mechanish we have in place to debug the failed run?
Yeah - the log is the way to pass it to the place it will be visible
(airflow log). And it's not much different
jens-scheffler-bosch commented on PR #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258#issuecomment-1785166976
> @jens-scheffler-bosch Just curious, what other mechanish we have in place
to debug the failed run?
Same here. I assume we have a general contratiction / conflict
potiuk merged PR #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258#issuecomment-1784278368
BTW. @jens-scheffler-bosch - first test suites are getting green in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35160, so I confirm it fixes the
original problem too.
--
This is an
potiuk commented on PR #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258#issuecomment-1784263022
> * Revers the efforts of @potiuk in [Handle left-over termination logs from
previous runs with same cache
#35252](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35252) - Sorry as termination
jens-scheffler-bosch opened a new pull request, #35258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35258
This PR reverts PR #35252 as the fix made in this PR just fixed one side
effect.
Unfortunately when initially the PR #33355 was created I did not see that
all temporary scripts
