Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-06 Thread via GitHub
ferruzzi closed pull request #40073: Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-06 Thread via GitHub
potiuk commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2151472561 BTW. For botocore specifically, we might have another reason to bump it - due to botocore releasing almost every day, bumping it from time to time to just limit the available number of

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
potiuk commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2151467274 And yes we are doing it alread - merged 2 days ago :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
potiuk commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2151466854 > That's why the --resolution lowest flag on uv is appealing btw, it'll let us identify when we've missed bumping the min on a dep :) (though I'm not sure if we are doing that yet or

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
jedcunningham commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2151062276 That's why the `--resolution lowest` flag on uv is appealing btw, it'll let us identify when we've missed bumping the min on a dep :) (though I'm not sure if we are doing that

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
jedcunningham commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2151060724 Generally speaking, yes, we should set the min based on what we actually need from that dep. Of course, constraints can and will have the higher version. -- This is an

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
ferruzzi commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2150959336 @jedcunningham We needed 1.34.90 for a feature that was requested, and I did that bump yesterday. So no, the bump from x.90 to x.106 isn't currently mandatory, but there are a lot

Re: [PR] Bump botocore from 1.34.90 to 1.34.106 [airflow]

2024-06-05 Thread via GitHub
jedcunningham commented on PR #40073: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40073#issuecomment-2150921564 For my own edification, is there a reason we need to bump the min version? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on