romsharon98 opened a new pull request, #38646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38646
closes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34154
cc: @SamWheating
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines
romsharon98 opened a new pull request, #38649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38649
closes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34154
cc: @SamWheating
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines]
romsharon98 closed pull request #38646: Improve stability of
remove_task_decorator function
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38646
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
SamWheating commented on PR #38649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38649#issuecomment-2030147771
Thanks for reviving this old PR, I totally forgot about it but I'm glad to
see that its back up for review 🙌
FWIW I still think that this is an imperfect solution (and anythi
eladkal merged PR #38649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38649
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.
romsharon98 commented on PR #38649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38649#issuecomment-2030482012
> Thanks for the fix, even did not know about this bug. Thanks also for the
TODO; I assume there should be better options to parse the source code other
than cutting by keywords.
