vincbeck merged PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
potiuk commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769139998
> Here is the way I see it :) There is no such api_auth in auth managers.
There are API auth provided by Airflow itself (session, default and deny_all)
and API auth provided by auth mana
vincbeck commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769137290
> As far as I understand (and I might be wrong), currently the way how to
configure backends in order to get the UI working is:
airflow.api.auth.backend.basic_auth,airflow.api.auth.bac
potiuk commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769122593
> Nice! This way, you just need to do something similar if you want your
auth manager to provider Kerberos support!
Precisely
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
vincbeck commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769121909
> > Another solution would be to return NotImplemented by default and
try/catch this exception. If this exception is thrown, then no Kerberos
>
> I'd say we could just leave a ba
potiuk commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769118838
> Another solution would be to return NotImplemented by default and
try/catch this exception. If this exception is thrown, then no Kerberos
I'd say we could just leave a base
vincbeck commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1769107921
> Obviously. I missed the fact that "session_auth" remained where it was. I
see that "session" will remain where it was. Clear. And expectation is that if
you implement an AuthManger a
potiuk commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1768984626
> Multiple answers here :)
Because there were multiple questions :) .
> > I think we should make it explicit in docs that those authentication
backends for the API are
vincbeck commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1768733409
Multiple answers here :)
> I think we should make it explicit in docs that those authentication
backends for the API are available only when FAB auth manager is used. Likely
we
potiuk commented on PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#issuecomment-1768567973
I think we should make it explicit in docs that those authentication
backends for the API are available only when FAB auth manager is used. Likely
we should also rename/depreceate the co
vincbeck commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1362623199
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contrib
potiuk commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1362543661
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contribut
potiuk commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1362543661
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contribut
vincbeck commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1362206694
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contrib
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1361313195
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contri
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1361311059
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contri
vincbeck commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1361303612
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contrib
vincbeck commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1361304073
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contrib
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924#discussion_r1361299228
##
airflow/auth/managers/fab/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contri
vincbeck closed pull request #34924: Move Rest API auth related methods to FAB
auth manager
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
vincbeck opened a new pull request, #34924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34924
Multiple authentications are possible for the Rest API. [See
documentation](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/api.html).
With AIP-56, all these configurations besides t
21 matches
Mail list logo
