boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2341542029
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to
check our [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues) for
additional contributions.
sc-anssi commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2337585317
> @sc-anssi So then I would say... if you fix the static checks then we
could merge it and back-port to a 2.10.2 release...
Spelling is fixed, please let me know if anything else
jscheffl commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2329570708
> > Some static checks fail. Though I like the implementation a lot more
than before... actually as project team we have decided (1) that Airflow 2.10
will only get new features in exc
bbovenzi commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2329358130
> Some static checks fail. Though I like the implementation a lot more than
before... actually as project team we have decided (1) that Airflow 2.10 will
only get new features in excep
jscheffl commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2323044478
Some static checks fail. Though I like the implementation a lot more than
before... actually as project team we have decided (1) that Airflow 2.10 will
only get new features in excepti
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-2309064126
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
sc-anssi commented on PR #40414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40414#issuecomment-928469
Thanks for the feedback ! I'll try to check whether the `format` attribute
of the JSON schema for `string` type can be used in this case.
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
