potiuk commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1792700269
Good to see this "per-provider" configuration feature... But that reminds me
that we need a bit more "discovery"
Look at "docs/apache-airflow-providers-celery" - there is
configu
potiuk commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1792690567
Nope. It looks cool.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
potiuk merged PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
Piatachock commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1792114098
Andrey, thanks for your approval! Is there anything else that should be done
to merge this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
Taragolis commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1788667369
Need to add test for this changes.
For validate configuration, you might use `conf_vars` - context manager /
decorator. Some samples:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/b
Piatachock commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1787167736
Thanks! Managed to build provider locally and test it on our managed
solution. Works as expected
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
Taragolis commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1778920067
> I'm actually trying to build provider package locally to check it in our
Managed Airflow installation end-to-end.
Do you, by any chance, know where should I look for any info on t
Taragolis commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1778863223
> it in our Managed Airflow
BTW, you or some one from the Yandex also could add link to Yandex Managed
Service for Apache Airflow into [Airflow
Ecosystem](https://airflow.apac
Piatachock commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1778805964
> Static checks are failing
Sorry, forgot to mark this PR as WIP.
I'm actually trying to build provider package locally to check it in our
Managed Airflow installation end-t
Taragolis commented on code in PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#discussion_r1370969011
##
airflow/providers/yandex/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -70,3 +70,15 @@ hooks:
connection-types:
- hook-class-name: airflow.providers.yandex.hooks.yandex.YandexCloudBa
eladkal commented on PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#issuecomment-1774002746
Static checks are failing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
Taragolis commented on code in PR #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059#discussion_r1365676440
##
airflow/providers/yandex/hooks/yandex.py:
##
@@ -85,17 +85,24 @@ def get_connection_form_widgets() -> dict[str, Any]:
),
}
+@classmet
Piatachock opened a new pull request, #35059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35059
New features for YandexCloud Provider:
* Support User-Agent header parametrization via environent variable
* Store Service Account ID from Connection in Hook; use it as default in
DataprocCl
13 matches
Mail list logo
