nitinmuteja commented on PR #23531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23531#issuecomment-1120697440
Added test for the change.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #23579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23579#issuecomment-1120789296
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
eladkal merged PR #23579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23579
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 827bfda59b Update dags.rst (#23579)
827bfda59b is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new cca9fab8fa Updating
mthakare-onshape opened a new pull request, #23579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23579
Missing bracket?
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #23579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23579#issuecomment-1120686386
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
potiuk commented on issue #23576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23576#issuecomment-1120838998
This has been investigated by the Moto team and it turned out to be
unexpected change in behaviour of `xmltodict`. They fixed it in the upcoming
3.1.9 and once they release we
raphaelauv commented on PR #23518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23518#issuecomment-1120889908
@kaxil hey since you work on astronomer-providers could you review , thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23575#issuecomment-1120704679
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
eduardchai opened a new issue, #23580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23580
### Apache Airflow version
2.3.0 (latest released)
### What happened
`task_id` with `.` e.g. `hello.world` is not rendered in grid view.
### What you think should happen
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #23580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23580#issuecomment-1120719027
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
tirkarthi commented on issue #23417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23417#issuecomment-1120813132
@bbovenzi I can take this. Please add a permalink to the github code that
you want to migrate to rest API . I couldn't find `objects/tree_data` endpoint
in current views.
--
potiuk closed issue #23572: cli command `dag-processor` uses `[core]
sql_alchemy_conn`
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23572
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 9837e6d813 Fix dag-processor fetch metabase config
potiuk merged PR #23575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23575
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #23575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23575#issuecomment-1120824192
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
ecerulm commented on PR #23578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23578#issuecomment-1120692664
See #23521
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
jakubno commented on code in PR #23301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23301#discussion_r867729738
##
tests/hooks/test_subprocess.py:
##
@@ -96,3 +96,9 @@ def test_should_exec_subprocess(self, mock_popen,
mock_temporary_directory):
stderr=STDOUT,
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23570#issuecomment-1120788500
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the
potiuk commented on PR #23570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23570#issuecomment-1120895217
Merging.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk merged PR #23570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #23570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23570#issuecomment-1120895058
Jsut random test refused to start.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk closed issue #22908: Breeze: Add nicer error for BREEZE.rst update
static check
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22908
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk opened a new pull request, #23582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23582
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23579#issuecomment-1120690259
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide that full
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #23227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23227#issuecomment-1120747018
Another PR addressing the issue: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23451
cc: @Bowrna
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
tirkarthi commented on issue #23580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23580#issuecomment-1120747748
cc: @bbovenzi I guess this has something to do with `task_id` having dot
used to render in splitting task_id by dot :
dgdelahera commented on PR #23450:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23450#issuecomment-1120727593
My first approach was to check the `base` container. I think it is the
simplest one, but I wasn't sure it that approach was generic enough (sidecars
finishing before the workload).
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #23227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23227#issuecomment-1120740197
@bbovenzi @Bowrna I'm leaning towards updating the existing
clearTaskInstances endpoint to optionally accept dag_run_id. This is a
duplication of the existing endpoint
johannesjung commented on issue #22397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22397#issuecomment-1120937990
Hi @potiuk, thank you for pushing towards upgrading Flask-AppBuilder. I see
that you had started to work on this issue in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22587, but
potiuk commented on code in PR #23468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23468#discussion_r867875723
##
docs/apache-airflow/concepts/cluster-policies.rst:
##
@@ -57,12 +57,17 @@ This policy checks if each DAG has at least one tag defined:
Task policies
-
bbovenzi commented on issue #23580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23580#issuecomment-1120983270
Oh good catch. We can parse out the names differently to avoid this problem
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
lozuwa opened a new issue, #23584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23584
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.4
### What happened
We have upgraded from Airflow 1.10.5 to Airflow 2.2.4. Upgrade path was
1.10.5 -> 1.10.15 -> 2.1.0 -> 2.2.4
Everything seems
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #23584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23584#issuecomment-1121022127
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 4485393562 Add support for queued state in DagRun
potiuk commented on code in PR #23481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23481#discussion_r867954118
##
airflow/api_connexion/openapi/v1.yaml:
##
@@ -2442,6 +2442,7 @@ components:
enum:
- success
- failed
+- queued
potiuk merged PR #23481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #23420: Add a queue DAG run endpoint to REST API
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23420
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
snjypl commented on issue #21087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21087#issuecomment-1121052643
@ecerulm
as i understand there are two aspects to this issue:
**1.) preventing 410 error from happening:**
To prevent it we need to use the BOOKMARK feature. it
potiuk merged PR #23486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23486
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 4485393562 Add support for queued state in DagRun update endpoint.
(#23481)
add 7813f996ab Fix scheduler crash
potiuk commented on PR #19702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19702#issuecomment-1121085277
@torbjornvatn -> can you rebase this one on top of latest main in case it
fails?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
potiuk commented on issue #15150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15150#issuecomment-1121125655
> Seems strange to have that unique constraint. If two DAG runs have
different run_ids, why not let them run at the same time?
Because historically execution date was the key
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23559#discussion_r868039292
##
airflow/operators/python.py:
##
@@ -327,7 +327,13 @@ class PythonVirtualenvOperator(PythonOperator):
processing templated fields, for examples
ianbuss commented on PR #23535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23535#issuecomment-1121189758
@tirkarthi @NickYadance could you take a look at this PR to make sure it
covers the issue you're facing in #23532 .
@potiuk added some basic infinite recursion detection logic
thinhnd2104 commented on issue #23469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23469#issuecomment-1120940781
@potiuk yes. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
thinhnd2104 closed issue #23469: Airflow ecs fail to fetch logs from cloudwatch
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23469
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 98571ecb66 Updating
johannesjung commented on issue #22397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22397#issuecomment-1120960388
Thanks for the quick reply. It is not my field of expertise, so I would be
happy if someone else gives it a try. It would be great to get rid of the older
version of
potiuk commented on issue #23085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23085#issuecomment-1121073063
Hey @edithturn - how is it going :) ? I am reaching the end of my other
changes and might pick it up too.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk merged PR #589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/589
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #23090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23090#issuecomment-1121127906
Can you please rebase @edithturn - we had some refactoring/changes and this
one is now conflicting.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23559#issuecomment-1121132712
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23559#issuecomment-1121132715
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the
Bowrna commented on code in PR #23516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23516#discussion_r868046251
##
airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py:
##
@@ -450,6 +451,99 @@ def post_clear_task_instances(*, dag_id: str, session:
Session = NEW_SESSION) ->
potiuk commented on issue #23497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23497#issuecomment-1121187437
Ah ok. I see. Would you like to propose a PR to fix it ? You seem to
understand very well both the root cause, you can apparently reproduce it and
you seem to understand well how
potiuk commented on issue #22397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22397#issuecomment-1120948926
This was just a draft to try it and see if it works, It had a number of
problems in just "dependencies".
It means that it's not "straightforward" and someone will need to make a
potiuk commented on issue #23453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23453#issuecomment-1121061522
I would not worry about sqlite. By definition it's only for development and
testing and it's ok to remove any sqlite database and recreate it from the
scratch. Should we close this
potiuk closed pull request #19702: Switch Markdown engine to markdown-it-py
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19702
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
torbjornvatn opened a new pull request, #19702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19702
As mentioned in #16435 will switching to markdown-it-py give much more
advanced Markdown rendering and make it behave almost like to Github Flavored
Markdown
closes: #16435
related:
potiuk commented on PR #19702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19702#issuecomment-1121084608
Reopened it to rebuild - but I am afraid there is a change that might fail
the K8S tests.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
josh-fell commented on PR #22938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22938#issuecomment-1121135108
@epapineau How would users typically connect to these single-tenant
instances? Does one API key have access to multiple, single-tenant instances or
should one API only have access to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23582#issuecomment-1120910273
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide that full
tirkarthi commented on issue #23447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23447#issuecomment-1120956230
I guess this can be closed now with
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23575 merged .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on issue #23447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23447#issuecomment-1121014156
Indeed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk closed issue #23447: External DAG processor not working
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23447
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk commented on PR #23562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23562#issuecomment-1121057147
I'd love get that one merged to get it in the hands of Breeze users. I will
have to refresh cache before merge. But I think it will be really nice
improvement - finally :)
--
This is
potiuk commented on issue #23495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23495#issuecomment-1121077872
Can you do that by extending the helm-chart? I believe Helm charts can be
extended by making the subcharts , so you can write your own chart with Airflow
chart as a Subchart and
potiuk commented on code in PR #23506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23506#discussion_r868022398
##
scripts/ci/libraries/_initialization.sh:
##
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ function initialization::initialize_base_variables() {
export
rotemseekingalpha commented on issue #23588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23588#issuecomment-1121123177
[Video](https://youtu.be/BD91yCd6r68) that shows the problem
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on issue #9967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9967#issuecomment-1121122511
Cool. Thanks for sharing your case @flaviomax . I add this use case to my
portfolio of "potential problems to suggest our users to look for :)". Actually
that might be a cool idea to
ecerulm commented on issue #21087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21087#issuecomment-1121165082
@snjypl , let me see if I can address you comments (in no particular order,
sorry)
### allow_watch_bookmark=True does not prevent 410
> it is because of this bug in
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 7c7b001a63 tHe output of commands of Breeze are only generated when
they change (#23570)
add 1220c1a7a9 Fixed
potiuk merged PR #23582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23582
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bbovenzi commented on issue #23417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23417#issuecomment-1120987663
oh yes, we renamed it to `grid_data`. I updated the link too.
We probably don't need to return the `dag_runs` part of the response and
instead use the list dag runs
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #23516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23516#discussion_r867938334
##
airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py:
##
@@ -450,6 +451,99 @@ def post_clear_task_instances(*, dag_id: str, session:
Session =
ashb commented on code in PR #23506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23506#discussion_r868026504
##
scripts/ci/libraries/_initialization.sh:
##
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ function initialization::initialize_base_variables() {
export CURRENT_PYTHON_MAJOR_MINOR_VERSIONS
jpipas commented on issue #23588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23588#issuecomment-1121172291
Getting the same thing - It appears to be an issue with the getTask API
(there's several javascript errors in console). Most notably the /tasks
endpoint for a given dag.
ldacey commented on issue #23472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23472#issuecomment-1121184528
Sorry for the late reply, I am using PostgreSQL. I assume that I just became
impatient and canceled the db upgrade command prematurely. I am not sure why my
task_fail table had
potiuk commented on issue #23469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23469#issuecomment-1120939085
@thinhnd2104 - do you think the issue is closed by #23470 ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
ecerulm commented on issue #21087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21087#issuecomment-1120994210
@snjypl, does not `allow_watch_bookmarks` prevent a "410 GONE", and does
not prevent the current airflow code path to enter an infinite loop because of
it.
The current
potiuk commented on issue #22397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22397#issuecomment-1121015252
> Thanks for the quick reply. It is not my field of expertise, so I would be
happy if someone else gives it a try. It would be great to get rid of the older
version of dependencies
wojsamjan opened a new pull request, #23583:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23583
Add links to assets for Cloud SQL & migrate system tests (AIP-47)
Co-authored-by: Wojciech Januszek
[janus...@google.com](mailto:janus...@google.com)
Co-authored-by: Lukasz
potiuk opened a new issue, #23585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23585
### Body
The current version of API
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/stable-rest-api-ref.html
shows version 1.0.0. I think this is terribly wrong and we shoudl synchronize
snjypl commented on issue #21087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21087#issuecomment-1121062446
> So again there is never a guarantee that the last resource version that
you got is going to be valid the next time that you start the watch, no matter
how well you
potiuk commented on PR #589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/589#issuecomment-1121071852
Anyone :) ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
snjypl commented on issue #21087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21087#issuecomment-1121079448
the code you shared is not really a good way to demonstrate `BOOKMARK`.
but still:
> for i in watcher.stream(v1.list_namespaced_pod, namespace,
resource_version=1,
potiuk closed issue #23497: Tasks stuck indefinitely when following container
logs
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23497
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on issue #23497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23497#issuecomment-1121089809
Can you please try it with Airflow 2.3.0 @schattian - one of the changes in
2.3.0 (And corresponding cncf provider 4.0+ was to migrate to newer kubernetes
libraries that are
potiuk commented on issue #17176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17176#issuecomment-1121095023
I think not. The long term solution is to switch to Task Group. Subdags are
deprecated and are going to be removed in Airflow 3 anyway, so the best we can
advice is to switch to
potiuk closed issue #17176: TriggerDagRunOperator triggering subdags out of
order
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17176
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
rotemseekingalpha opened a new issue, #23588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23588
### Apache Airflow version
2.3.0 (latest released)
### What happened
After the upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.3.0, some DAGs grid data seems missing and
it renders the UI blank
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #23588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23588#issuecomment-1121114782
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on code in PR #23506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23506#discussion_r868023074
##
scripts/ci/libraries/_initialization.sh:
##
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ function initialization::initialize_base_variables() {
export
ashb commented on code in PR #23535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23535#discussion_r868030054
##
tests/utils/test_file.py:
##
@@ -78,6 +78,29 @@ def test_open_maybe_zipped_archive(self):
class TestListPyFilesPath(unittest.TestCase):
+def setUp(self):
schattian commented on issue #23497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23497#issuecomment-1121121785
@potiuk hm I don't see how that could help here.
The code here continuous to be blocking execute:
potiuk commented on issue #23513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23513#issuecomment-1121141870
If you can see the environment properly set in the flower container, there
is no reason why it should not work - please double-check (exec into your
container and check if it is
bbovenzi commented on issue #23227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23227#issuecomment-1121141332
@ephraimbuddy That's fine with me to just add `dag_run_id`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
potiuk commented on PR #23036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23036#issuecomment-1121146826
> I might be completely missing it, but where is this parameter being used?
Seems like this change creates an instance attribute of `container_timeout` and
remains unused.
It
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
