jedcunningham commented on code in PR #32099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32099#discussion_r1240592248
##
airflow/models/baseoperator.py:
##
@@ -1001,6 +1001,14 @@ def __enter__(self):
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
amoghrajesh commented on PR #31376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31376#issuecomment-1605244487
@hussein-awala can we merge this PR too as the dependent PR has been merged
recently?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
vandonr-amz commented on code in PR #32112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32112#discussion_r1240552004
##
tests/system/providers/amazon/aws/example_sagemaker.py:
##
@@ -159,12 +159,11 @@ def _build_and_upload_docker_image(preprocess_script,
repository_uri):
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #32113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32113#issuecomment-1605198948
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
aagateuip opened a new pull request, #32113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32113
---
* Added retries to extract_xcom to guard against intermittent network
connectivity failures.
* xcom json is validated to make sure entire json was retrieved.
* xcom sidecar is
vandonr-amz opened a new pull request, #32112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32112
took the opportunity to fix tiny things in the system test,
and also migrate to the trigger to the method that logs the status while it
waits
--
This is an automated message from the
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #31040: Added kube-prometheus-stack
servicemonitor to gather metrics from Airflow statsd exporter
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31040
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #30581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30581#issuecomment-1605178177
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new b0a5ba8486 Updating
ITJamie commented on code in PR #30531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30531#discussion_r1240510568
##
airflow/utils/email.py:
##
@@ -19,22 +19,69 @@
import collections.abc
import logging
-import os
import re
-import smtplib
import warnings
-from
getaaron commented on issue #31105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31105#issuecomment-1605119355
> Yeah, I thought of a way where we could maintain separate log_pos for
different streams. This way we do not have to pull the whole file into memory
just to get the final few
potiuk commented on PR #32110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32110#issuecomment-1605084324
static checks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk commented on PR #31920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1605076347
Woooho!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk merged PR #31920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new b28c90354f Deprecate the 2 non-official
potiuk commented on PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#issuecomment-1605071290
errors.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
dstandish commented on PR #32053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32053#issuecomment-1605068228
OK @uranusjr @ephraimbuddy @jedcunningham the scope of this PR expanded a
little bit.
I wanted to add validation so that (1) a task can't be both setup and
teardown, (2) once you
potiuk commented on issue #32048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32048#issuecomment-1605064459
But yes. I am all for clarifying the behaviour, getting `airflow db init` to
be renamed and defining when we create default conneciotns (and whether they
should be coming from
potiuk commented on issue #32048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32048#issuecomment-1605062163
> How do we decide which providers would have default connections out of the
box or in the past, since I don't see it for all of them? were there any
criteria to be met?
>
>
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 05a67efe32 Add an option to load the dags from db
potiuk merged PR #32038:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32038
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #32020: Airflow tasks run -m cli command giving 504 response
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32020
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on PR #29055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/29055#issuecomment-1605060078
> This is still blocked by #30727 waiting for a merge of that one
Maybe good time to merge it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new a5923a2b97 Updating
potiuk commented on issue #32111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32111#issuecomment-1605058814
Assigned you. Feel free to provide PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
potiuk commented on PR #32054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32054#issuecomment-1605048344
> I'm going to check other changes in appbuilder since 4.3.1 and create a
summary.
Cool. I think the only thing that matters are changes that might need to be
ported to
potiuk commented on PR #32016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32016#issuecomment-1605038514
conflicts :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #32111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32111#issuecomment-1605035075
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
aagateuip opened a new issue, #32111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32111
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### What happened
We have seen that KubernetesPodOperator sometimes fails to retrieve json
from xcom
killua1zoldyck commented on issue #31105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31105#issuecomment-1605020397
Yeah, I thought of a way where we could maintain separate log_pos for
different streams. This way we do not have to pull the whole file into memory
just to get the final
potiuk closed issue #31054: Can not get more logs of DAGS on UI when deploy on
Kubernetes
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31054
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on issue #31054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31054#issuecomment-1605004330
Can you please update to 2.6.2 - there were a few issues connected to logs
in 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 and they seem to be related (see for "logs" in the release
notes). I think they should
guard13 commented on issue #15291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15291#issuecomment-1605003054
Good morning,
I give you the link to my solution which works and allows me to continue
Airflow either on the Datascientest VM (but it dropped me, while resetting) or
on my
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
onikolas pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new d49fa999a9 bugfix: break down run+wait method in
o-nikolas merged PR #32104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32104
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
vandonr-amz opened a new pull request, #32110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32110
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
onikolas pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 72d09a677f Use a waiter in `AthenaHook` (#31942)
o-nikolas merged PR #31942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31942
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
onikolas pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 5c887988b0 Refactor Eks Create Cluster Operator
o-nikolas merged PR #31960:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31960
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
killua1zoldyck commented on issue #31105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31105#issuecomment-1604974487
@potiuk The current log-streaming logic pulls the whole file into memory
before moving to the specific log_pos based on the metadata after combining all
the logs and
potiuk closed issue #32023: Container Image not trusting LDAP certifcates
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32023
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
potiuk commented on code in PR #31840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31840#discussion_r1240378757
##
docs/apache-airflow/authoring-and-scheduling/deferring.rst:
##
@@ -166,3 +166,25 @@ Airflow tries to only run triggers in one place at once,
and maintains a
potiuk commented on code in PR #31840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31840#discussion_r1240373057
##
docs/apache-airflow/authoring-and-scheduling/deferring.rst:
##
@@ -166,3 +166,25 @@ Airflow tries to only run triggers in one place at once,
and maintains a
potiuk commented on PR #32013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32013#issuecomment-1604933188
BTW. The description should be generic enough to be "transplantable", also
it needs ``.. versionadded:: 2.7`` in the documentation as this exception will
not be available for earlier
potiuk commented on PR #32013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32013#issuecomment-1604929908
I like the idea.
BUT.
This will only be useful and usable if you describe your use case in the
documentation -
vidyapanchalZS commented on issue #32071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32071#issuecomment-1604914542
Hello Hussein,
thank you for looking into this request. In this request , i also mentioned
some other "airflow tasks" cli command which giving similar output as
potiuk commented on PR #29790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/29790#issuecomment-1604888950
> @potiuk is it okay if someone else forks Kyle's repo and fix the static
check to not lose @kyle-winkelman's credit/commits and also address the
previous comments made by @alexott? I
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #32107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32107#issuecomment-1604884866
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
Srabasti opened a new issue, #32107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32107
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### What happened
When running Dataflow job in Cloud Composer composer-1.20.12-airflow-1.10.15
Airflow
tomrutter commented on issue #32091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32091#issuecomment-1604881767
I think task instance is set just below on line 691.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
tomrutter commented on issue #32091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32091#issuecomment-1604832307
Will check, but wouldn't all triggers fail if that were the case? There are
many (>100) identical triggers working and only one that fails (all using the
same custom trigger). I
stikkireddy commented on PR #29790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/29790#issuecomment-1604803451
@potiuk is it okay if someone else forks Kyle's repo and fix the static
check to not lose @kyle-winkelman's credit/commits and also address the
previous comments made by @alexott?
raphaelauv commented on PR #32004:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32004#issuecomment-1604795966
thanks for the explanation
I could build locally the CI image without mysql ->
```shell
breeze ci-image build --force-build --python-image
darkag commented on PR #32089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32089#issuecomment-1604773094
I tried to simplify code. I added a better handling for log_level parameter
(add possibility to pass log level as "warning" and not just 30). Correction
for request_complex_types which
hussein-awala commented on issue #32091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32091#issuecomment-1604772168
> It seems that as triggers fire, the link between the trigger row and the
associated task_instance for the trigger is removed before the trigger row is
removed. This leaves
pankajkoti commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604761320
Thank you for clarifying in detail @potiuk and the quick fix. Yes, was
wondering intially if the image itself needed some fix, but all clear now.
--
This is an automated
bhagany commented on issue #32106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32106#issuecomment-1604752241
I should mention that I am about to go on a 2-week vacation, so while I am
willing to discuss and submit a PR, my responses will be delayed. I also think
this is a serious enough
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #32106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32106#issuecomment-1604748574
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
bhagany opened a new issue, #32106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32106
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### What happened
We experienced this issue Airflow 2.6.1, but the problem exists in the
Google provider
potiuk commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604742095
Looks good !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
bhagany commented on issue #32093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32093#issuecomment-1604715011
Thank you for submitting this -- I have been procrastinating filing an issue
of my own about this inconsistent handling of project ids. I believe the
problems with changes to
potiuk commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604711224
BTW @pankajkoti clarifying comment:
The reason why the PR to remove support was included in the list was this
vijayasarathib commented on PR #32105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32105#issuecomment-1604703092
>
sure
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dnskr commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604701317
- [Use template comments for the chart license header
#30569](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30569)
Looks good, all license header replacements are in place.
-
potiuk commented on PR #32105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32105#issuecomment-1604700861
Ah. Checked that the link does not work. There is a mistake with "alias"
package for the BaseOperator. he right fix is to change it to
`airflow.models.baseoperator.BaseOperator` in
potiuk commented on PR #32105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32105#issuecomment-1604696556
The link is there. Clicking on class should lead you there.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk closed pull request #32105: Adding missing hyperlink to the tutorial
documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32105
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
vijayasarathib opened a new pull request, #32105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32105
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for
potiuk commented on code in PR #32052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32052#discussion_r1240170213
##
airflow/www/static/js/connection_form.js:
##
@@ -123,6 +125,16 @@ function applyFieldBehaviours(connection) {
*/
function handleTestConnection(connectionType,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 24e3d6ce57 Remove unclear (referring to CI)
potiuk merged PR #32103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32103
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604683871
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32103 -> to remove the confusing
paragraph.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
potiuk commented on PR #32103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32103#issuecomment-1604683438
It's funny to read your own description that you don't understand or that is
more confusing than lack of it.
Especially in the transition period, the original "clarification"
vandonr-amz opened a new pull request, #32104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32104
This method is just causing trouble by handling several things, it's hiding
the logic. A bug fixed in #31838 was reintroduced in #31881 because the check
that was skipped on
potiuk opened a new pull request, #32103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32103
The paragraph was supposed to clarify things but it makes it confusing - it
attempted to explain the difference vs "default" and supported versions of
Python, referring to CI. Unfortunately this
dstandish commented on code in PR #32053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32053#discussion_r1240156463
##
airflow/example_dags/example_setup_teardown_taskflow.py:
##
@@ -47,12 +45,10 @@ def normal():
@task_group
def section_1():
# You can also
potiuk commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604673066
> I am wondering if we want to include #30963 here as the PR has an
associated milestone of 2.7.0
Python version is connected with Airflow version. It's not "chart" property
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 09e7891ea0 Updating
pankajkoti commented on issue #32096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32096#issuecomment-1604651640
I am wondering if we want to include
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30963 here as the PR has an associated
milestone of 2.7.0
If we want to include it here, I
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #32053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32053#discussion_r1240114070
##
airflow/example_dags/example_setup_teardown_taskflow.py:
##
@@ -47,12 +45,10 @@ def normal():
@task_group
def section_1():
# You can also
spire-mike commented on issue #29531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/29531#issuecomment-1604625983
Thanks @knab-analytics, that's too bad. I hope it gets resolved. As a
workaround I set `depends_on_past=False` and am using `ExternalTaskSensor` to
ensure the last task of the
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #32052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32052#discussion_r1240093747
##
airflow/www/static/js/connection_form.js:
##
@@ -123,6 +125,16 @@ function applyFieldBehaviours(connection) {
*/
function
potiuk commented on issue #31733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31733#issuecomment-1604592441
Can you please update to 2.6.2 ? I believe this is manifestation of a known
issue -> see release notes and look for 'logs'
blcksrx commented on code in PR #31798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31798#discussion_r1240077652
##
pyproject.toml:
##
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ extend-ignore = [
# * Disable `flaky` plugin for pytest. This plugin conflicts with
`rerunfailures` because provide same
potiuk commented on code in PR #31798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31798#discussion_r1240072325
##
pyproject.toml:
##
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ extend-ignore = [
# * Disable `flaky` plugin for pytest. This plugin conflicts with
`rerunfailures` because provide same
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 415e076761 Deferrable mode for ECS operators
potiuk merged PR #31881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31881
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #32004:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32004#issuecomment-1604563692
The way to solve it later is to make a PR from "airflow" repo (then image
build happens in-ci-workflow and the workflow has enough permissions to be able
to push such image to airflow
AVMusorin opened a new pull request, #32102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32102
Since gunicorn can't reload a new code if starts with ``--preload`` setting,
we need to check ``reload_on_plugin_change`` before set it up.
Gunicorn can't reload a new code because the code
potiuk commented on PR #32004:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32004#issuecomment-1604561636
Yes. Because for non-committers, "build-image" is run from "main" not from
your PR and in main you have `PYTHON_BASE_IMAGE=python:3.8-slim-bullseye`. The
way to solve it is to push your
pankajastro commented on code in PR #32029:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32029#discussion_r1240051624
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/sensors/emr.py:
##
@@ -424,12 +431,16 @@ def __init__(
job_flow_id: str,
target_states: Iterable[str] | None =
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new e4ca68818e Adapt Notifier for
ephraimbuddy merged PR #31887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31887
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #32101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32101#issuecomment-1604522311
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
adh-wonolo opened a new pull request, #32101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32101
Backfill Job Runner pulls in the class name of your executor but doesn't
pull in the full path so if you aren't using a default core executor you get an
error like:
```
File
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 63a8e19d8e Updating
eladkal closed issue #32030: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on
June 20, 2023
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32030
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
eladkal commented on issue #32030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32030#issuecomment-1604465569
Thank you everyone.
Providers are released
I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of
open issues can be found
eladkal merged PR #819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/819
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
