eladkal commented on code in PR #38287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38287#discussion_r1607748032
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/neptune.py:
##
@@ -32,6 +36,50 @@
from airflow.utils.context import Context
+def handle_waitable_exception(
+
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39732
Related: #39485
Removing deprecated DrillOperator from docs and tests and replacing with
SQLExecuteQueryOperator
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
eladkal closed issue #39379: Issues with configuring airflow 2.6.3/python3.11
with LDAP
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39379
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39730
Related: #39485
Removing deprecated SqliteOperator from docs and tests and replacing with
SQLExecuteQueryOperator
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39729
Related: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39485
Removing deprecated SnowflakeOperator from docs and tests and replacing with
SQLExecuteQueryOperator
---
Bowrna commented on issue #39485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39485#issuecomment-2121816874
Raising PR for Snowflake and SQLite too!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Bowrna commented on PR #39725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39725#issuecomment-2121815950
@dirrao you may need to edit the documentation part too
airflow/docs/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/operators.rst
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39728:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39728
Related: #39485
Removing deprecated TrinoOperator from docs and tests and replacing with
SQLExecuteQueryOperator
---
**^ Add meaningful description
Bowrna commented on issue #39485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39485#issuecomment-2121813081
> I am going to raise PR for Trino.
oops @dirrao I am sorry I raised a PR without noticing it :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
Bowrna commented on PR #39706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39706#issuecomment-2121804101
@Taragolis I have added the warning part in docs. Let me know if it looks
good now. Will do the same for the other DB related providers too!
--
This is an automated message from the
tanvn commented on PR #39406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39406#issuecomment-2121761730
@jedcunningham @hussein-awala ping
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39727
Related: #39485
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39726
Related: #39485
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
dirrao opened a new pull request, #39725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39725
Resolving mysql deprecated operator warnings
related: #39485
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
karenbraganz opened a new pull request, #39724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39724
Check pool_slots value in mapped tasks using partial()
---
Issue #39639 was opened because a DAG import error would show up for regular
tasks with an incorrect
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #38931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38931#issuecomment-2121467063
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] closed issue #38931: sla_miss_callback is not working with
5 input parameters as official document, only dag_id 1 input is allowed, no
enough context for alert
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38931
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mateuslatrova commented on issue #39026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39026#issuecomment-2121387562
> > Hi @slycyberguy , are you still handling this issue? I am also
interested in it, in case you need any help.
>
> Hi @mateuslatrova. It looks like I'm getting
RNHTTR commented on issue #39639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39639#issuecomment-2121383804
Done!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
karenbraganz closed pull request #39505: Render map_index_template when the
task status is set manually
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39505
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jedcunningham merged PR #39696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39696
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #39696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39696#discussion_r1607344807
##
airflow/sensors/time_sensor.py:
##
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, *, target_time, **kwargs):
self.target_datetime =
jscheffl opened a new pull request, #39723:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39723
As I am starting to build a PoC and experience code in and for AIP-69 I
realized that provider packages from the mono-repo do not load plugins when
starting the system via breeze. Plugins are
karenbraganz commented on issue #39639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39639#issuecomment-2121258722
I would like to be assigned this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
raphaelauv commented on code in PR #39654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39654#discussion_r1607279904
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/transfers/s3_to_dynamodb.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
dstandish merged PR #39604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39604
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dondaum commented on code in PR #39654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39654#discussion_r1607267994
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/transfers/s3_to_dynamodb.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39603#discussion_r1607251286
##
tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:
##
@@ -3869,13 +3870,118 @@ def dict_from_obj(obj):
assert created_run.data_interval_start == DEFAULT_DATE +
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39603#discussion_r1607251286
##
tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:
##
@@ -3869,13 +3870,118 @@ def dict_from_obj(obj):
assert created_run.data_interval_start == DEFAULT_DATE +
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39603#discussion_r1607250735
##
tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:
##
@@ -3869,13 +3870,118 @@ def dict_from_obj(obj):
assert created_run.data_interval_start == DEFAULT_DATE +
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39603#discussion_r1607249732
##
tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:
##
@@ -3869,13 +3870,118 @@ def dict_from_obj(obj):
assert created_run.data_interval_start == DEFAULT_DATE +
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39603#discussion_r1607248871
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##
@@ -1277,6 +1277,10 @@ def _create_dag_runs_dataset_triggered(
]
if previous_dag_run:
pedro-cf opened a new issue, #39722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39722
### Apache Airflow version
2.9.1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
When using `ObjectStoragePath` to send a file to
bolkedebruin commented on PR #39606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39606#issuecomment-2121092524
@potiuk Airflow 2.8.4 requires (constraints) universal-path 0.1.4 which is
indeed not compatible with python 3.12. However., I am not sure if this is
related. The `namespace`
kahlstrm commented on PR #39496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39496#issuecomment-2121036687
@eladkal fixed the tests, seems like the odd behavior with
`TaskInstanceState.DEFERRED` was fixed, and me working around it in these tests
were broken due to that.
--
This is an
shahar1 commented on code in PR #39329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39329#discussion_r1607151894
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/pod.py:
##
@@ -533,24 +539,31 @@ def find_pod(self, namespace: str, context: Context, *,
exclude_checked: bool =
dstandish commented on code in PR #39336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39336#discussion_r1607103303
##
airflow/providers/dbt/cloud/CHANGELOG.rst:
##
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@
Changelog
-
+main
+.
+
+In Airflow 2.10.0, we fix the way try_number works, so
RNHTTR commented on code in PR #39701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39701#discussion_r1607086380
##
airflow/www/views.py:
##
@@ -785,13 +787,25 @@ def index(self):
# Remove the reset_tags=reset from the URL
return
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39721#discussion_r1607079331
##
airflow/providers/openlineage/conf.py:
##
@@ -14,6 +14,19 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
dstandish commented on code in PR #39259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39259#discussion_r1607061565
##
airflow/models/taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -1003,25 +1009,40 @@ def _refresh_from_task(
task_instance_mutation_hook(task_instance)
+@internal_api_call
dstandish commented on code in PR #39259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39259#discussion_r1607059883
##
airflow/models/taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -1003,25 +1009,40 @@ def _refresh_from_task(
task_instance_mutation_hook(task_instance)
+@internal_api_call
ecodina commented on PR #39701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39701#issuecomment-2120878422
@bbovenzi done! Similarly to the tags I added the "reset_filter" param to
reset the cookie when we deselect the filter. However, the user does not see
it, since it immediately
ambika-garg commented on PR #39243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39243#issuecomment-2120876679
Agreed, I'll submit this PR for the Power BI operator under microsoft.azure
(initially, I mistakenly mentioned Azure Data Factory). So, let's go ahead and
close this PR for now.
kacpermuda commented on PR #39721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39721#issuecomment-2120845371
@JDarDagran ping
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #39721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39721
Adding a docstring to conf.py describing how we should retrieve OL
configuration. Adjusting `dag_state_change_process_pool_size` to match that
logic.
---
**^ Add
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39259#discussion_r1607024896
##
airflow/models/taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -1003,25 +1009,40 @@ def _refresh_from_task(
task_instance_mutation_hook(task_instance)
+@internal_api_call
dstandish commented on code in PR #39604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39604#discussion_r1607023336
##
airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py:
##
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ def serialize(
elif isinstance(var, MappedOperator):
return
kahlstrm commented on PR #39496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39496#issuecomment-2120824638
> @kahlstrm can you fix the failing tests?
Sure, didn't realize the tests failing are related ones, one sec.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
dstandish commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120823774
also for reference @jscheffl here's the PRs that came before on this one
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pulls?q=is%3Apr+project%3Aapache%2F169+is%3Aclosed
--
This is
dstandish commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120822126
> So as you cherry-pick into smaller PRs and leaving complexity
manageable... if all is green might still be good to merge the pieces and I
assume to make it working then a few other
dstandish commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120816036
> missing in internal API or will Subdag just not be supported?
+ etc
ah yeah those scenarios are good to add to my testing dag. maybe you could
share your dag? and maybe i
jscheffl commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120812783
> thanks @jscheffl -- which branch were you on? there are more changes re
mapping on the "mothership" PR (#37851) that are excluded from this PR just for
easier review -- that's the
dstandish commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120782203
thanks @jscheffl -- which branch were you on? there are more changes re
mapping on the "mothership" PR (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37851)
that are excluded from this PR
jscheffl commented on PR #38992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38992#issuecomment-2120775487
Okay, did some testing with a breeze setup, manually "massaged" the ENV to
enable AIP-44, strated internal API server, took away the DB connection and set
the internal API endpoints
dirrao commented on issue #39485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39485#issuecomment-2120770948
I am going to raise PR for Trino.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
bbovenzi commented on PR #39701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39701#issuecomment-2120769740
> > Might it be cleaner to just unselect failed? There are only two buttons,
so I don't know that it makes sense to include an "all states" button when
there are only two states to
dstandish commented on code in PR #39604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39604#discussion_r1606973017
##
airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py:
##
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ def serialize(
elif isinstance(var, MappedOperator):
return
mobuchowski merged PR #39614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39614
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr merged PR #39719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39719
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39696#discussion_r1606959336
##
airflow/sensors/time_sensor.py:
##
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, *, target_time, **kwargs):
self.target_datetime =
bbovenzi commented on PR #39636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39636#issuecomment-2120729661
> @utkarsharma2 yes you are right
>
> then this ?
>
>
eladkal commented on issue #39712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39712#issuecomment-2120696473
> Recently I worked on this and the information is available as part of UI
and API for tasks in scheduled or None state. Perhaps the API could be used for
export and also enriched
eladkal commented on PR #39496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39496#issuecomment-2120655139
@kahlstrm can you fix the failing tests?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Lee2532 commented on issue #39682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39682#issuecomment-2120627003
What happen if you change your script to? print to logging
import time
import logging
if __name__ == '__main__':
for i in range(10):
time.sleep(2)
uranusjr opened a new pull request, #39719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39719
Minor improvement from #39670. Instead of `raise exception`, re-raise the
original exception instead to preserve the error stack. Code under the raise is
unindented instead of using `else`.
--
uranusjr commented on code in PR #39604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39604#discussion_r1606822943
##
airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py:
##
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ def serialize(
elif isinstance(var, MappedOperator):
return
VladaZakharova closed pull request #39716: Refactor Datapipeline operators and
fix system tests
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39716
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
adrienyhuel commented on issue #39718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39718#issuecomment-2120444203
Hello @emirhanaydin61
It is related to #33619
Airflow use "apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch" to read logs, and the
latests versions aren't compatible with
jonathan-ostrander commented on code in PR #39694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39694#discussion_r1606765260
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/pod.py:
##
@@ -842,16 +838,14 @@ def cleanup(self, pod: k8s.V1Pod, remote_pod: k8s.V1Pod):
if
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #39718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39718#issuecomment-2120412681
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
emirhanaydin61 opened a new issue, #39718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39718
### Apache Airflow version
2.9.1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
Hello, we are using airflow 2.4.0 and were
VladaZakharova commented on code in PR #39716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39716#discussion_r1606732810
##
tests/deprecations_ignore.yml:
##
@@ -395,6 +395,9 @@
-
potiuk commented on PR #39606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39606#issuecomment-2120356096
> together with OL support, so I'm trying to understand if there might be
some mismatch of the provider versions there.
I think the problem is connected with upath integration.
potiuk commented on PR #39606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39606#issuecomment-2120352219
> @potiuk Could you please tell me which command should i run to reproduce?
Are we running the providers from current main against different airflow
versions or are we using some past
andreyvital opened a new issue, #39717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39717
### Apache Airflow version
2.9.1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
```
[2024-05-20T12:03:24.184+]
tirkarthi commented on issue #39712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39712#issuecomment-2120336770
Recently I worked on this and the information is available as part of UI and
API for tasks in scheduled or None state. Perhaps the API could be used for
export and also enriched
BasPH commented on PR #34487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34487#issuecomment-2120314813
Hi @jscheffl, unfortunately life got in the way of investing time in OSS
work the last year.
The essentials are there but I was working on integrating this code nicely
with
EMT-Swaroop commented on issue #39522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39522#issuecomment-2120313306
@dirrao , we didn't customize any configuration in the statsd deployment, we
are using the stasd exporter which coming from the parent airflow chart (1.13.1)
--
This is an
raphaelauv commented on PR #39636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39636#issuecomment-2120304664
@utkarsharma2 yes you are right
then this ?
--
This is an
eladkal commented on code in PR #39716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39716#discussion_r1606679948
##
tests/deprecations_ignore.yml:
##
@@ -395,6 +395,9 @@
-
VladaZakharova opened a new pull request, #39716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39716
This PR:
Removes datapipeline module from Google provider
Moves all the related operators inside Dataflow service, based on the API
that is used inside operators
Adds new
eladkal commented on issue #39219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39219#issuecomment-2120292442
> Some of the SQL Sensors from time to time does not respect the timeout
interval and run the entire DAG for multiple days. The sensors we use have
waiting timeout 12 hours and
eladkal commented on issue #39219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39219#issuecomment-2120286663
> Unfortunately it looks like it is a locked down parameter :-(
>
> Amazon MWAA reserves a set of critical environment variables. If you
overwrite a reserved variable,
eladkal commented on issue #39306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39306#issuecomment-2120283215
Not sure what we can do here without reproduce example
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
eladkal closed issue #39708: data to long when using s3 to gcs
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39708
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
eladkal opened a new pull request, #39714:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39714
Bump version to avoid workaround of taking direct dependency on
`beautifulsoup4`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
utkarsharma2 commented on PR #39636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39636#issuecomment-2120227411
> maybe something like
>
>
MaksYermak commented on PR #39711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39711#issuecomment-2120222492
> > It is needed to fix the issue in acknowledged functionality in
deferrable mode.
>
> If this is a bug fix then we should have a unit test to avoid regression
Bowrna commented on PR #39713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39713#issuecomment-2120193949
I will add the PR for other google cloud examples as each of the fix in it
have different set of doubts. Raising multiple PR to avoid confusion
--
This is an automated message from
eladkal commented on code in PR #39336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39336#discussion_r1606589165
##
airflow/providers/dbt/cloud/CHANGELOG.rst:
##
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@
Changelog
-
+main
+.
+
+In Airflow 2.10.0, we fix the way try_number works, so
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39713
Related: #39485
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
eladkal commented on PR #39711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39711#issuecomment-2120177756
> It is needed to fix the issue in acknowledged functionality in deferrable
mode.
If this is a bug fix then we should have a unit test to avoid regression
--
This is an
MaksYermak opened a new pull request, #39711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39711
In this PR I have refactored the trigger for PubSubPullSensor. It is needed
to fix the issue in acknowledged functionality in deferrable mode. We need to
acknowledge after the
VladaZakharova commented on PR #39659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39659#issuecomment-2120148328
@eladkal
Yes, thank you , will be good to add system test here to cover this
scenario: f.e. try to create dataset and table with location different from
`US` and then run
fbertos commented on PR #19842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19842#issuecomment-2120101929
Dear all,
Looks like this is happening again as we are receiving the following
messages after upgrading to version Airflow 2.9.1 (we are using PostgreSQL
15.7.0):
raphaelauv commented on code in PR #39654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39654#discussion_r1606529029
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/transfers/s3_to_dynamodb.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
Taragolis commented on PR #39706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39706#issuecomment-2120042506
Looks really nice!
I would suggest to keep information about PostgresOperator into the
documentation, e.g. in warning block
This might help users who try to search
Taragolis commented on issue #39682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39682#issuecomment-2120013361
I guess it similar to https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39686
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Bowrna commented on PR #39709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39709#issuecomment-212723
I will add the fix for ECS and EMR in this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #39709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39709
Related: #39485
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
1 - 100 of 62183 matches
Mail list logo
