matt-land opened a new pull request #4136: Fix for scheduler infinite loop when 
evaluating non-UTC DAGs after DST
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/4136
 
 
   …ing than their start state
   
   Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below.
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [ ] My PR addresses the following 
[Airflow-1710](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW/) issues and 
references them in the PR title. For example, "\[AIRFLOW-1710\] My Airflow PR"
     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1710
     - In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your 
commit with \[AIRFLOW-XXX\], code changes always need a Jira issue.
   
   ### Description
   
   - [X ] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   
   This fixes the infinite loop in the AF jobs scheduler scanning a DAG with a 
start date in Daylight Savings Time while evaluating a potential run date in 
Standard Time.
   
   The infinite loop Airflow gets trapped in is below:
   
   `while next_run_date <= last_run.execution_date:
       next_run_date = dag.following_schedule(next_run_date)`
   
   dag.following_schedule is not incrementing as expected. It instead starts to 
repeating values that dag.following_schedule has already returned.
   
   This is caused by an interaction between a pendulum instance timezone having 
a DST offset this is 'illegal' for the evaluated next run date.
   
   IE, If I call following_schedule with a dag.timezone that has a DST offset 
of -5, but on the date being evaluated the value should be -6, the function 
stops incrementing and repeats ranges of values.
   
   The fix is to simply drop the dst offset from dag.timezone.  
dag.following_schedule will then increment normally, it fixes the infinite loop.
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [X] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for 
this extremely good reason:
   
   I need help with my PR
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [ ] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I 
have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my 
commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes 
how to use it.
     - When adding new operators/hooks/sensors, the autoclass documentation 
generation needs to be added.
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - [ ] Passes `flake8`
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to