[GitHub] [calcite] asolimando commented on pull request #2901: [CALCITE-5264] Apply hint exclusion check for all rels in the RelOptCall

2022-10-21 Thread GitBox
asolimando commented on PR #2901: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2901#issuecomment-1286888938 @Aitozi, can you squash the commits into a single one having as commit message `[CALCITE-5264] HintStrategy rule exclusion does not match innermost rels`? As soon as this is done I am

[GitHub] [calcite] asolimando commented on pull request #2901: [CALCITE-5264] Apply hint exclusion check for all rels in the RelOptCall

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
asolimando commented on PR #2901: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2901#issuecomment-1282762416 The PR LGTM, I will merge by the end of this week if there will be no objections -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] [calcite] asolimando commented on pull request #2901: [CALCITE-5264] Apply hint exclusion check for all rels in the RelOptCall

2022-10-12 Thread GitBox
asolimando commented on PR #2901: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2901#issuecomment-1275935388 > Hi @asolimando can you help me here: > > when I develop on the calcite, I found it's not easy to conform its checkstyle, especially the indentation. I have tried > > *

[GitHub] [calcite] asolimando commented on pull request #2901: [CALCITE-5264] Apply hint exclusion check for all rels in the RelOptCall

2022-10-11 Thread GitBox
asolimando commented on PR #2901: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2901#issuecomment-1274946950 > @asolimando Thanks for your comments, I have addressed them. And rebase on the latest master force pushed. Thanks @Aitozi for addressing the comments so fast! However,

[GitHub] [calcite] asolimando commented on pull request #2901: [CALCITE-5264] Apply hint exclusion check for all rels in the RelOptCall

2022-10-11 Thread GitBox
asolimando commented on PR #2901: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2901#issuecomment-1274816052 Apart from few minor comments, the PR looks good to me. I have checked the original PR and the discussion there, it makes sense to me too to check all rels, but since I am not very