tjbanghart commented on PR #2973: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2973#issuecomment-1319499323
Wouldn't `DATETIME` map to Calcite's interpretation of a `TIMESTAMP` due to the lack of TZ info? Also, should we move this into the core parser? I don't feel strongly either way (or if it matters all that much) but the BQ style literals and some functions live in core already. Otherwise, LGTM and a great example for adding other functions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@calcite.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
