[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10311) It looks like our type alterations may be buggy

2015-11-12 Thread Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002577#comment-15002577 ] Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-10311: --- At least

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10311) It looks like our type alterations may be buggy

2015-11-01 Thread Robert Stupp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14984389#comment-14984389 ] Robert Stupp commented on CASSANDRA-10311: -- Do we need type alterations at all? The number

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10311) It looks like our type alterations may be buggy

2015-09-13 Thread Robert Stupp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14742444#comment-14742444 ] Robert Stupp commented on CASSANDRA-10311: -- Probably related: CASSANDRA-10027 > It looks

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10311) It looks like our type alterations may be buggy

2015-09-13 Thread Benedict (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14742452#comment-14742452 ] Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-10311: -- So, taking that as evidence that the problem is real, it