Enormous counter
-----------------
Key: CASSANDRA-3006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3006
Project: Cassandra
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.8.3
Environment: ubuntu 10.04
Reporter: Boris Yen
I have two-node cluster with the following keyspace and column family settings.
Cluster Information:
Snitch: org.apache.cassandra.locator.SimpleSnitch
Partitioner: org.apache.cassandra.dht.RandomPartitioner
Schema versions:
63fda700-c243-11e0-0000-2d03dcafebdf: [172.17.19.151, 172.17.19.152]
Keyspace: test:
Replication Strategy: org.apache.cassandra.locator.NetworkTopologyStrategy
Durable Writes: true
Options: [datacenter1:2]
Column Families:
ColumnFamily: testCounter (Super)
"APP status information."
Key Validation Class: org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.BytesType
Default column value validator:
org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.CounterColumnType
Columns sorted by:
org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.BytesType/org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.BytesType
Row cache size / save period in seconds: 0.0/0
Key cache size / save period in seconds: 200000.0/14400
Memtable thresholds: 1.1578125/1440/247 (millions of ops/MB/minutes)
GC grace seconds: 864000
Compaction min/max thresholds: 4/32
Read repair chance: 1.0
Replicate on write: true
Built indexes: []
Then, I use a test program based on hector to add a counter column
(testCounter[sc][column]) 1000 times. In the middle the adding process, I
intentional shut down the node 172.17.19.152. In addition to that, the test
program is smart enough to switch the consistency level from Quorum to One, so
that the following adding actions would not fail.
After all the adding actions are done, I start the cassandra on 172.17.19.152,
and I use cassandra-cli to check if the counter is correct on both nodes, and I
got a result 1001 which should be reasonable because hector will retry once.
However, when I shut down 172.17.19.151 and after 172.17.19.152 is aware of
172.17.19.151 is down, I try to start the cassandra on 172.17.19.151 again.
Then, I check the counter again, this time I got a result 481387 which is so
wrong.
I use 0.8.3 the reproduce this bug, but I think this also happens on 0.8.2 or
before also.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
