andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-600847619
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-602768635
Not good (still testing a few more scenarios and will update this comment
once done):
## XENSERVER (7.1):
### snapshot.backup.to.seconda
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-606064729
So - yes, when using KVM+NFS and snapshot.backup.to.secondary=false - there
is all kind of mess with snapshots happening - both in 4.11.3 and in maste
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-606101797
I proposed that we continue/merge this PR as it is (I want to confirm a few
more things with testing, specifically that VMware is still not affected)
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-606129284
@blueorangutan test matrix
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-607219803
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-607319803
when NOT backing up the snap to secondary - the snap fails to be
deleteddamn it 😢
2020-04-01 15:29:22,117 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(qtp50
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-607322344
I've made other extensive tests and everything works fine when
snapshot.backup.to.secondary=TRUE - including GC on the snapshot_store_ref
table.
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-609044924
@blueorangutan test
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-609950065
Latest testing of the deletion stuff reports below
(previously I have tested normal operations works fine - convert to this to
that, revert (KV
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-610018095
Tested the latest commit - to confirm proper logging:
## snapshot.backup.to.secondary=TRUE
### Normal case - 2 rows present, for both IMAGE/P
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-610019986
not gonna run ANY test or package rebuild after the last commit - a single
word was changed in the comment/logging (from "backup" to "secondary")
---
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-610296032
(will wait for test matrix to finish)
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-610295953
@GabrielBrascher @DaanHoogland I've tested deleting the snaps while SSVM was
destroyed - indeed the delete action is "successful" but the file is left
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-610827367
XS test that needs investigation:
2020-04-07 16:45:40,456 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: test_03_list_snapshots:
['Traceback (most recent call last):\
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611252468
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-67u3
This is an automated message from the Apache
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611587549
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611681037
So it does @Slair1 ...
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611688138
Ape, do your thing! @blueorangutan test matrix
This is an automated message from the
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611703714
@Slair1 I can't, I'm off as from 10min ago (late night, time for beer) -
perhaps @DaanHoogland can confirm once more tomorrow
---
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-611704299
Is this for volume or VM snapshots @Slair1 ? - as volume snapshots are NOT
possible for KVM while the VM is running (someone thought that's interestin
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-612005865
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-71
This is an automated message from the Apache
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-612006447
@blueorangutan test
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613054117
I don't see it myself, despite @DaanHoogland confirming the commit being
present in 4.13 branch... Some regression by someone?
-
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613055232
but you can test 4.13.1 RC1 and see if VMs are suspended as expected -
perhaps some parts of the code were refractored or so...
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613081297
Agree, it's gone/messed up (trying to understand what happened with some of
my colleagues who are good with git) - some code refactoring happened betw
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613085691
@Slair1 do you mind creating a PR for MASTER (not 4.13 - we already have RC1
for vote today) to add back those few lines... it's incredible - the glob
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613090734
@Slair1 - the bug you shared (RHEL bug), was marked as WON'T FIX - and was
raised against qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6_4.1.x86_64
Can you please
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613612963
Clear, I did a bit of reading myself. Say, what about corruption when
creating snapshots? - in recent qemu releases (2.10) qemu-img actually opens
qc
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3969: Snapshot deletion issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3969#issuecomment-613655243
tested, confirmed the issue with latest centos7 host (centos5.5 ext3 guest -
simulated high IO load while deleting the snap and broke the VM)
R
30 matches
Mail list logo
