[GitHub] [cloudstack] rvalle commented on issue #4270: Multiple purposes for Public IPs in VPCs.

2020-12-03 Thread GitBox
rvalle commented on issue #4270: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4270#issuecomment-738003219 Thanks @DaanHoogland , I understand this issue is about implementing the "conserve-mode" for VPCs, which is complex. A first step could be to be able to enable conserve-mode

[GitHub] [cloudstack] rvalle commented on issue #4270: Multiple purposes for Public IPs in VPCs.

2020-10-07 Thread GitBox
rvalle commented on issue #4270: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4270#issuecomment-705159546 @DaanHoogland I have been trying different setups: I think the OSPF only works with VPC to VPC connectivity or VPC to VPN. I don't know what the difference between the VR o

[GitHub] [cloudstack] rvalle commented on issue #4270: Multiple purposes for Public IPs in VPCs.

2020-09-28 Thread GitBox
rvalle commented on issue #4270: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4270#issuecomment-700056721 I wonder if the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol as described in the [ShapeBlue Blog](https://www.shapeblue.com/inter-vpc-connectivity-in-cloudstack/) Would work bet

[GitHub] [cloudstack] rvalle commented on issue #4270: Multiple purposes for Public IPs in VPCs.

2020-09-15 Thread GitBox
rvalle commented on issue #4270: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4270#issuecomment-692533624 after having worked a bit with VPCs I can see what @andrijapanicsb meant in the mailing list with architectural constraints to supporting the same IP public address for many differ

[GitHub] [cloudstack] rvalle commented on issue #4270: Multiple purposes for Public IPs in VPCs.

2020-08-28 Thread GitBox
rvalle commented on issue #4270: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4270#issuecomment-682436070 @rhtyd I don't understand, what do you think could be achieved via API? This is an automated message from the Apach