justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-459170520
The current output of the scan query is a collection of ScanResultValue
objects (String segmentId, List columns, Object events) where
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-459170520
The current output of the scan query is a collection of ScanResultValue
objects (String segmentId, List columns, Object events) where
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-459170520
The current output of the scan query is a collection of ScanResultValue
objects (String segmentId, List columns, Object events) where
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-459170520
The current output of the scan query is a collection of ScanResultValue
objects (String segmentId, List columns, Object events) where
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-458773614
The way Scan is written now, the "scan query doesn't retain all rows in
memory before rows can be returned to client"
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-458773614
The way Scan is written now, the "scan query doesn't retain all rows in
memory before rows can be returned to client"
justinborromeo edited a comment on issue #6088: Scan query: time-ordering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6088#issuecomment-458658358
Would it make sense to have both `timeOrder` _and_ the `descending`
parameter (from BaseQuery)?
