[GitHub] [hudi] aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: Do we have any TTL mechanism in Hudi?

2021-04-07 Thread GitBox
aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2743#issuecomment-815462565 @n3nash Thanks for the clarificatio. Can we create a jira for the same. I can't pick this right away but would try to conntribute as and when I get time. Meanwhile I will try to

[GitHub] [hudi] aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: Do we have any TTL mechanism in Hudi?

2021-04-05 Thread GitBox
aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2743#issuecomment-813779228 Thanks @lw309637554 Will look into this deletePartition in depth. As for my use case, the ideal situation would be to have some kind of row level TTL taken care by cleaner/com

[GitHub] [hudi] aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: Do we have any TTL mechanism in Hudi?

2021-04-05 Thread GitBox
aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2743#issuecomment-813450681 I think the ideal way should be around compactor and cleaner. Time based cleaner and filtering records with older commit time while compacting base file should solve the issue.

[GitHub] [hudi] aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: Do we have any TTL mechanism in Hudi?

2021-03-30 Thread GitBox
aditiwari01 commented on issue #2743: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2743#issuecomment-810782992 I was thinking around similar lines but we do have continuous jobs (not deltastreamer, but spark streaming jobs with 5/10 mins minni batches). We can't have a separate job for delet