[GitHub] [hudi] satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: [HUDI-1534]HiveSyncTool-It is not necessary to use JDBC and MetaStoreClient at the same time

satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2532#issuecomment-808605301 @lhjzmn we discussed this in one of the OSS meetings. we want to keep jdbc support for backward compatibility reasons. we can separate out MetastoreClient as a separate class

[GitHub] [hudi] satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: [HUDI-1534]HiveSyncTool-It is not necessary to use JDBC and MetaStoreClient at the same time

satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2532#issuecomment-785301048 > Hello People, > > Is this PR could help in my problem? > > #2588 > > @satishkotha @lhjzmn @rubenssoto I dont think so. This PR is removing jdbc

[GitHub] [hudi] satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: [HUDI-1534]HiveSyncTool-It is not necessary to use JDBC and MetaStoreClient at the same time

satishkotha commented on pull request #2532: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2532#issuecomment-783799632 @lhjzmn Can you start a discuss thread in dev and users channel. I think removing JDBC support requires consensus in community