pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-557349460
cc @TaoLv
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-557349398
@rongzha1 please try to run the script and verify the CPU performance.
--
pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-556947255
> It would be great if you can put your run script together with logs in a
repo and share it here so we can reproduce or track lat
pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-556710714
> Running CIFAR10 training on the c5.18xlarge cpus with mxnet-cu100 (Note: I
just set the number of gpus to 0 for the script):
pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-554818323
> Hey @pengzhao-intel, I tested training on GPU and inference on CPU. For
inference, the times came very close to each other so I
pengzhao-intel commented on issue #16845: MXNet 1.6.0 performance regression
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16845#issuecomment-554815820
Thanks for the validation. Do you have a chance to try CPU?
This
