sxjscience commented on pull request #18648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652784885
Close this PR now
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
sxjscience commented on pull request #18648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652784828
@ciyongch I'm going to test v1.7 after this backporting PR
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18653) is merged. WOuld you
merge that one?
---
sxjscience commented on pull request #18648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652510821
@sandeep-krishnamurthy @ciyongch I created this PR to track how many numpy
commits would potentially go into v1.7.0 (not all of them should go into 1.7.0):
W
sxjscience commented on pull request #18648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652295990
In addition, we do have the ability to test whether the numpy APIs are
stable or not by checking the tests in GluonNLP:
https://github.com/dmlc/gluon-nlp/tree/numpy
sxjscience commented on pull request #18648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652267739
@ciyongch I find that there are lots of numpy stuffs here. This is the
initial attempt for backporting some commits. One issue is #17645, in which I'm
not sure whe
