safrooze edited a comment on issue #11913: Unexpectedly poor copy() performance
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11913#issuecomment-413372266
@wkcn You are correct that the evaluation is lazy, but calling nd.waitall()
does indeed wait for everything to finish, so
safrooze edited a comment on issue #11913: Unexpectedly poor copy() performance
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11913#issuecomment-409792751
@wkcn Is the result you're reporting with any modifications to the script? I
don't quite understand what modification you're
safrooze edited a comment on issue #11913: Unexpectedly poor copy() performance
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11913#issuecomment-409040744
@rahul003 Thanks for the comment. The results are identical, with or without
the `nd.waitall()` because creating creating an
safrooze edited a comment on issue #11913: Unexpectedly poor copy() performance
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11913#issuecomment-409040744
@rahul003 Thanks for the comment. The results are identical, with or without
the 1nd.waitall()` because creating creating an
safrooze edited a comment on issue #11913: Unexpectedly poor copy() performance
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11913#issuecomment-409040744
@rahul003 Thanks for the comment. The results are identical, with or without
the `nd.waitall()` because creating creating an
