shtirlic commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2903431398
Update:
changed the chip name to `rp23xx-rv` and board name to
`raspberrypi-pico-2-rv` to me more consistent
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
jlaitine opened a new issue, #16430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16430
### Description / Steps to reproduce the issue
**Problem statement**
This is an old bug/vulnerability, which has been in NuttX for ages. signal
delivery is done from several contexts, and in
CosmicRoach opened a new issue, #16429:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16429
### Description / Steps to reproduce the issue
Returned Value:
* External port number on success; 0 on failure
In some cases，when the return value is 0, it may indicate success.
!
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from b2315e98c4 sched/semaphore: Always free mutex holder at nxsem_post
add 3ce85ca54e style: fix spelling in code c
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16401
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
linguini1 opened a new pull request, #16428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16428
## Summary
This implements an interrupt-based SPI driver for the BCM2711 SPI interfaces
(excluding auxiliary SPI interfaces). Only tested on SPI0 since proprietary
firmware does not initializ
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 9c09eb256 Publishing web: 16e1777
stbenn commented on issue #16416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16416#issuecomment-2902333171
@acassis No, this issue is separate from the flash progmem driver and
unrelated to the PR. I just discovered this bug while trying to work on progmem
with banks swapped.
The bu
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2902205896
@shtirlic
I have a suggestion. This could save some big headaches for developers in
the future using this config.
I suggest increasing the stacksize of nsh_main by changing the def
acassis commented on issue #16416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16416#issuecomment-2902187820
@stbenn does the PR #16422 closes this Issue?
You case setup a PR to close an issue automatically, just use "closes #123"
or "fixes #123" in the Summary
--
This is an automa
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2902107172
@shtirlic
Nice! I confirmed this works perfectly fine with ostest. The serial output
also looks consistent.
The problem I had was quite simple. Doing make distclean after chang
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16394#issuecomment-2902060258
@Fix-Point why ci still fail?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 3cf0abbfee arch/stm32h5: Fix FLASH bank logic during erase operations.
add b5a284fd6d sched/semaphore: Fix a bu
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16423
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
shtirlic commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901836134
> @shtirlic Nice, the warnings are gone!
>
> How do i make this using the custom built toolchain? It's targeting the
wrong one.
>
> > riscv32-unknown-elf-ld:
/opt/riscv32-g
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901793401
@shtirlic Nice, the warnings are gone!
How do i make this using the custom built toolchain?
It's targeting the wrong one.
> riscv32-unknown-elf-ld:
/opt/riscv32-gnu-toolc
simbit18 opened a new pull request, #16427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16427
## Summary
Removed from the arm-05.dat file the entries:
CMake,nrf52832-dk:buttons
CMake,nrf52832-dk:wdog
CMake,nrf52840-dk:adc
CMake,nrf52840-dk:buttons
CMake,nrf52840-dk
raiden00pl opened a new pull request, #16426:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16426
## Summary
fix defined but not used warning from CI:
Warning: nxstyle.c:767:13: warning: ‘backslash_to_slash’ defined but not
used [-Wunused-function]
767 | static void backslash_
shtirlic commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901681984
@keever50 I updated the branch, check pls
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901572217
> > Okay manually compiled the toolchain with the correct configuration, but
as probably expected, this did not make the nuttx configuration work 🤔
>
> It's just a warning(not sort
shtirlic commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901456297
> Okay manually compiled the toolchain with the correct configuration, but
as probably expected, this did not make the nuttx configuration work :thinking:
It's just a warning(not
raiden00pl opened a new pull request, #16425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16425
## Summary
fix various coding style issues for drivers/sensors:
- remove redundant `#define CONFIG_XXX` that should be provided from Kconfig
- correct section banners
- remove emp
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901423761
Okay manually compiled the toolchain with the correct configuration, but as
probably expected, this did not make the nuttx configuration work :thinking:
--
This is an automated messag
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901315623
Hmm, @shtirlic
configuration fails and I am not entirely sure what this means.
I cloned your branch.
Output of ./tools/configure.sh from NuttX:
> mkkconfig in /home/martin
stbenn commented on PR #16422:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16422#issuecomment-2901174117
@acassis When I get some free time, I will gladly create a version worthy of
nuttx-apps! Thanks for the suggestion
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
acassis commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2901025104
@shtirlic amazing! Kudos!!!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
acassis commented on code in PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#discussion_r2102410675
##
arch/risc-v/src/rp23xx-riscv/hardware/rp23xx_dreq.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/
+ * arch/risc
acassis commented on issue #16420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16420#issuecomment-2900991551
@xiaoxiang781216 I think one downside of removing CONFIG_ is that these
macros may become hard to find later. It's better to remove them step by step,
adding them to Kconfig.
--
T
acassis commented on code in PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#discussion_r2102410675
##
arch/risc-v/src/rp23xx-riscv/hardware/rp23xx_dreq.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/
+ * arch/risc
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16423#discussion_r2102218227
##
sched/semaphore/sem_post.c:
##
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ int nxsem_post_slow(FAR sem_t *sem)
if (mutex)
{
- uint32_t blocking_bit =
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16423#discussion_r2102211212
##
sched/semaphore/sem_post.c:
##
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ int nxsem_post_slow(FAR sem_t *sem)
if (mutex)
{
- uint32_t blocking_bit =
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16423#discussion_r2102113494
##
sched/semaphore/sem_post.c:
##
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ int nxsem_post_slow(FAR sem_t *sem)
if (mutex)
{
- uint32_t blockin
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16401#issuecomment-2900563790
> Is there anything else I need to do for this PR?
all change need at least two committer approve before merging.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
jlaitine commented on PR #16394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16394#issuecomment-2900554383
Yes, I can confirm that it now works, I had a messed-up environment myself.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
keever50 commented on PR #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424#issuecomment-2900483464
Wow!
That's great. I love RISC-V. I did not expect this RP23xx RISC-V to come to
NuttX.
I will be testing this out today as well, thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the
shtirlic opened a new pull request, #16424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16424
## Summary
### Changes from arm rp23xx
- Updated linker script
- Updated start
- New irq handling
- New timerisr
...
## Testing
```
nsh> cat /proc/cpuinfo
sumpfralle commented on PR #16401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16401#issuecomment-2900392627
Is there anything else I need to do for this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
jlaitine commented on PR #16394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16394#issuecomment-293212
Hm. I am experiencing an assertion in the test on rv-virt:smp, with updated
nuttx-apps and this PR still:
[CPU1] Assertion failed : at file: wdog.c:312 task(CPU1): ostest process:
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2101941154
##
fs/inode/fs_files.c:
##
@@ -858,6 +1026,342 @@ int fs_putfilep(FAR struct file *filep)
}
#endif
+/
39 matches
Mail list logo
