(nuttx) 03/03: arm64/imx9: Support & configure RGMII-ID on RTL8211F

2025-06-04 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 67c7a4018ad5a27b544353ac0549fa27c22605a2 Author: George Poulios AuthorDate: Wed Jun 4 11:33:35 2025 +0300 arm64/im

(nuttx) 02/03: arm64/imx9: Add missing ENET1 RGMII TXC pin muxing

2025-06-04 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit e382e2d525d0c57287495b945f5577126628659c Author: George Poulios AuthorDate: Wed Jun 4 11:21:20 2025 +0300 arm64/im

Re: [PR] Fix i.MX93 ENET1 (EMAC) TXC muxing and RGMII-ID setting [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea merged PR #16482: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16482 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apa

(nuttx) branch master updated (0ac580cb7a -> 67c7a4018a)

2025-06-04 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git from 0ac580cb7a arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions for mpfs new 08f41244bc boards/imx93-evk: Tidy

(nuttx) 01/03: boards/imx93-evk: Tidy up board.h ENET1 section

2025-06-04 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 08f41244bc5550d57a49013afb9c16c559af4fe1 Author: George Poulios AuthorDate: Wed Jun 4 11:11:02 2025 +0300 boards/i

Re: [PR] Fix arch perf events ifdef in alarm [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on PR #16487: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16487#issuecomment-2942967366 No, it is a mess. I'll give it one more try. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [PR] Added a small usability improve for Unix.mk savedefconfig [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
ValentiWorkLearning commented on PR #16312: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16312#issuecomment-2942915387 Re-requested review just to ask, what should be done with this PR then 😄 Should I refactor it somehow or can we merge it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2128016198 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2128016198 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2128016198 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2128016198 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2128016198 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

[PR] Fix arch perf events ifdef in alarm [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16487: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16487 ## Summary This fixes the ifdef in drivers/timers/arch_alarm.c, which may cause linking errors when architecture defines up_perf_* functions, but doesn't enable ARCH_PERF_EVENTS. ##

Re: [PR] Segger sysview improvements [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16483: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16483#discussion_r2127978773 ## drivers/segger/config/SEGGER_RTT_Conf.h: ## @@ -89,11 +81,11 @@ extern spinlock_t g_segger_lock; /* Lock RTT (nestable) (i.e. disable interrupts) */ -#define

Re: [PR] Segger sysview improvements [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16483: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16483#discussion_r2127978773 ## drivers/segger/config/SEGGER_RTT_Conf.h: ## @@ -89,11 +81,11 @@ extern spinlock_t g_segger_lock; /* Lock RTT (nestable) (i.e. disable interrupts) */ -#define

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2127895989 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

[PR] add spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt rspin_lock_irqsave_noprempt implement. [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jasonbu opened a new pull request, #16486: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486 ## Summary As our previous discussion, we should use a new API spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt to handle the spin_lock with sched locked, and did not change the default behavior of original spin_lock_i

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2127895989 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_RV_CPUI

Re: [PR] Segger sysview improvements [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16483: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16483#discussion_r2127794681 ## drivers/segger/config/SEGGER_RTT_Conf.h: ## @@ -89,11 +81,11 @@ extern spinlock_t g_segger_lock; /* Lock RTT (nestable) (i.e. disable interrupts) */ -

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#discussion_r2127788134 ## arch/risc-v/Kconfig: ## @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ config ARCH_CHIP_MPFS select ARCH_HAVE_PWM_MULTICHAN select ARCH_HAVE_S_MODE select ARCH_

(nuttx-website) branch asf-site updated: Publishing web: be40bd59e126a7ffe6ebacfb1b7682fcd8e89704 docs: 0ac580cb7a06d142cb5304d7cd4e5e60cc355fe3

2025-06-04 Thread github-bot
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push: new 656ddee19 Publishing web: be40bd5

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis merged PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apac

(nuttx) branch master updated: arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions for mpfs

2025-06-04 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 0ac580cb7a arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on PR #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485#issuecomment-2941071264 Fixed the mpfs:opensbi build linking. I had to explicitly select ARCH_PERF_EVENTS for all the mpfs targets. Sorry for the hassle... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940815730 > [@TimJTi](https://github.com/TimJTi) nice to know that my tutorial helped. If you can, please create a guide documentation explaining how to use NuttX with a webserver supporting CG

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940803076 @TimJTi nice to know that my tutorial helped. If you can, please create a guide documentation explaining how to use NuttX with a webserver supporting CGI, it could help more people t

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
patacongo commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940785767 > [@patacongo](https://github.com/patacongo) thank you. If built-in apps can't be run as I suggested (/bin/appname) then I suspect they probably used to be able to. You are

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940748375 OK...possibly success here already! I started to follow @acassis video and enabled: 1. Support PATH variable (CONFIG_LIBC_ENVPATH) 2. Default path to /bin (CONFIG_PATH_

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940664897 @patacongo thank you. If built-in apps can't be run as I suggested (/bin/appname) then I suspect they probably used to be able to. So: 1. Current documentation is - not surprisi

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
patacongo commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940625820 > I have tried the thttp example app, with binfs, and it doesn't work. It used to. Something has changed and, apparently, broken it. That is a daily occurrence anymore. To

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
patacongo commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940619316 > If I mount binfs at /bin, should I be able run builtin apps via nsh by calling them as /bin/appname? It has been so long since I have worked on the project, so I am hesitan

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940587275 I think you need to mount the external fs at /bin, it is similar what I did here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL6KAgkTb8M -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940515787 Alan - I have tried the thttp example app, with binfs, and it doesn't work. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to G

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940520778 > I see you are trying to use NuttX with webserver and CGI support. If I remember correctly [@patacongo](https://github.com/patacongo) created the unionfs exactly to do what you are w

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940468852 @TimJTi I think that thttpd-binfs board profile will be your better reference here. Please take a look at those configs and see if you can reproduce it. -- This is an automated me

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940438613 @TimJTi did you try to use an old NuttX version to compare? I think since BINFS is a virtual file system it is not expected to show the right size of binaries, but of course it could

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940461007 I tried to go back to an earlier version but there are just too many changes in the last year to make it an easy thing to do! I can understand why the file size is 0 - fair enou

Re: [I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484#issuecomment-2940452710 I see you are trying to use NuttX with webserver and CGI support. If I remember correctly @patacongo created the unionfs exactly to do what you are writing to do: execute some extern

[PR] arch/risc-v/mpfs: Add optimized perf timer functions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16485: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16485 ## Summary Add up_perf_ functions for MPFS, which don't rely on alarm/oneshot interface. Also add optimized up_udelay and up_ndelay functions, which use the MTIMER directly to measur

[I] [BUG] Is BINFS broken? [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi opened a new issue, #16484: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16484 ### Description / Steps to reproduce the issue I am trying to use BINFS to allow thttp to run CGI scripts. It seems that when you mount binfs all the builtin apps have zero size and cannot be executed

Re: [PR] sensors/nau7802: Fix format warning [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #16479: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16479#issuecomment-2940032624 > > Hi @simbit18 could you please help here: > > Hi @acassis at the moment this is a known bug of msys2 on GitHub #16010 (NuttX issue). Workaround is to restart the msys2 CI Job, an

[PR] Segger sysview improvements [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16483: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16483 ## Summary I recently tested segger sysview on MPFS platform, and found out some issues with the driver. This is a collection of patches which I made in order to make it usable for

Re: [PR] sensors/nau7802: Fix format warning [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16479: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16479 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu

Re: [I] [HELP] SD Card imxrt_dmapreflight: dcache unaligned buffer:0x202458b8 end:0x20245ab7 [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
keever50 commented on issue #16159: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16159#issuecomment-2939555892 @snikeguo This solution worked. Thanks! I'd like to add that if your board does not contain stm32_dma_alloc.c, you must add this. These can be copied from other existing H

Re: [PR] boot/nxboot: Enhancements to add progress messages and copy-to-RAM [nuttx-apps]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
TimJTi commented on PR #3068: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3068#issuecomment-2939372969 @xiaoxiang781216 @acassis Is this waiting on anything from me? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u

Re: [PR] Fix i.MX93 ENET1 (EMAC) TXC muxing and RGMII-ID setting [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
gpoulios commented on PR #16482: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16482#issuecomment-2939357911 ..also, I have yet to find a plausible explanation for how the original contribution worked with the EVK. Perhaps different default board muxings AND slightly different PHY revision (fea

Re: [PR] fs/vfs: Separate file descriptors from file descriptions [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
jlaitine commented on PR #16361: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#issuecomment-2939352629 I am experiencing kernel crashes related to sockets, sendmsg->psock_sendmsg . This PR solves the issue; is this now good to be merged? -- This is an automated message from th

[PR] Fix i.MX93 ENET1 (EMAC) TXC muxing and RGMII-ID setting [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
gpoulios opened a new pull request, #16482: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16482 ## Summary This PR fixes a couple of issues with the i.MX93 ethernet MAC driver preventing transmission in (at least) the EVK board. Prior configuration would allow receiving packets, but the

Re: [PR] Fix i.MX93 ENET1 (EMAC) TXC muxing and RGMII-ID setting [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
gpoulios commented on PR #16482: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16482#issuecomment-2939302424 @jlaitine or @pussuw perhaps can also have a look on this as the main contributors of this driver? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

Re: [PR] sensors/nau7802: Fix format warning [nuttx]

2025-06-04 Thread via GitHub
simbit18 commented on PR #16479: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16479#issuecomment-2939010526 > Hi @simbit18 could you please help here: > Hi @acassis at the moment this is a known bug of msys2 on GitHub https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16010 (NuttX issue). Wor

(nuttx) branch master updated (bcfcf03066 -> 0bfcbed934)

2025-06-04 Thread xiaoxiang
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git from bcfcf03066 arch/arm/src/mcx-nxxx/CMakeLists.txt: Aligned Cmake with Make add 0bfcbed934 sensors/nau7802: Fix f