yashmayya commented on issue #13604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13604#issuecomment-2233298045
@Jayesh-Asrani what's the exact exception you're seeing during the real time
ingestion? I tried ingesting some batch data with an MV boolean column, and
even that fails with the
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13642:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13642
Bumps
[com.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations](https://github.com/google/error-prone)
from 2.28.0 to 2.29.0.
Release notes
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13641
Bumps
[org.roaringbitmap:RoaringBitmap](https://github.com/RoaringBitmap/RoaringBitmap)
from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1.
Release notes
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13640
Bumps
[com.azure:azure-identity](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java) from
1.13.0 to 1.13.1.
Release notes
Sourced from
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13639#issuecomment-223317
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13639?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
gortiz commented on PR #13545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13545#issuecomment-2233014899
I've just open #13639 to disable LArray by default as a first step to end up
removing it completely
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
gortiz opened a new pull request, #13639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13639
We have been using UnsafePinotBufferFactory for a while with no regression
detected. I think it is a good time to start working on the plan to remove
LArray dependency (see #12810)
This PR
gortiz commented on code in PR #13303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13303#discussion_r1680820132
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/datablock/BaseDataBlock.java:
##
@@ -109,92 +114,27 @@ public BaseDataBlock(int numRows, @Nullable DataSchema
tibrewalpratik17 commented on issue #13629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629#issuecomment-2232962841
I found this comment --
https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/6887#issuecomment-837094283
where one of the concerns was that removing the metric while a new consuming
gortiz commented on code in PR #13573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13573#discussion_r1680795734
##
pinot-query-runtime/src/test/resources/queries/UDFAggregates.json:
##
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@
},
{
"sql": "SELECT PERCENTILE_TDIGEST(float_col,
gortiz commented on code in PR #13573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13573#discussion_r1680792812
##
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/operator/operands/FunctionOperand.java:
##
@@ -47,9 +48,32 @@ public
tibrewalpratik17 commented on issue #13629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629#issuecomment-2232917058
> Have you figured out thy the metric is not emitted?
I'm not entirely sure, but the `cleanupMetrics` method might be the cause.
It specifically removes the
xiangfu0 opened a new issue, #13638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13638
```
Error: org.apache.pinot.plugin.filesystem.S3PinotFSTest.testMoveFile --
Time elapsed: 1.377 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2024-07-17T08:16:14Z] but found
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13637#issuecomment-2232803602
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13637?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
mgranderath commented on issue #13556:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13556#issuecomment-2232727805
Added a draft of our solution
[here](https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13637/). I am also very open to
entirely changing the approach if there are better ideas!
--
This is
mgranderath opened a new pull request, #13637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13637
### Context
- https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13556
This allows for using properties of the `Request` object in the
`AccessControl` to achieve things like using the peer TLS
mgranderath commented on PR #13477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13477#issuecomment-2232662769
@Jackie-Jiang made the adjustment. Version 5 should fix the issue where the
connection factory is not being picked up from the
`PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager` so this has become
gortiz closed pull request #13605: Do not expand large SEARCH(input, Sarg)
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13605
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
gortiz commented on PR #13605:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13605#issuecomment-2232651228
Even we may need to apply something like this in the future, we are going to
let it be in standby for now given we don't know the impact that join main
have, specially in NOT IN case
--
gortiz merged PR #13609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13609
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
gortiz commented on PR #13609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13609#issuecomment-2232640284
> Should we also add the support for ISO format such as 2024-07-12T15:32:36?
I think we should define the exact syntax we support. IMO we should include
what we are accepting right
jasperjiaguo commented on PR #13533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13533#issuecomment-2232605900
nit: I think `x OR NOT y` is equal to `x NOT y` (from my testing)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
xiangfu0 commented on PR #13630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13630#issuecomment-2232548249
> `boolean[]` should not flow into the segment creation engine. Its value
should already be replaced with internal storage format within
`DataTypeTransformer`
Seems that the
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13636#issuecomment-223253
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13636?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
zhtaoxiang opened a new pull request, #13636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13636
Similar to `UpsertConfig`, we want to add a `metadataTTL` to `DedupConfig`.
With this config, we can clean up stale dedup metadata.
This PR only adds this config. How to use this config to
yashmayya commented on code in PR #13628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13628#discussion_r1680430202
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/QueryEnvironment.java:
##
@@ -190,14 +194,32 @@ public List getTableNamesForQuery(String
sqlQuery) {
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13635#issuecomment-2232430358
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13635?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
swaminathanmanish commented on code in PR #13632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13632#discussion_r1680401702
##
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/utils/SegmentLocks.java:
##
@@ -18,30 +18,25 @@
*/
package
tibrewalpratik17 opened a new pull request, #13635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13635
label:
`refactor`
Recently, while working on files affected by the PR, I attempted to use
IntelliJ's reformat-file feature. However, it introduced many unrelated
changes, so I
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #13632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13632#discussion_r1680390383
##
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/utils/SegmentLocks.java:
##
@@ -18,30 +18,25 @@
*/
package
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13632
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13634#issuecomment-2232294564
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13634?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
sullis opened a new pull request, #13634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13634
Instructions:
1. The PR has to be tagged with at least one of the following labels (*):
1. `feature`
2. `bugfix`
3. `performance`
4. `ui`
5. `backward-incompat`
6.
swaminathanmanish commented on code in PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#discussion_r1680289873
##
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/api/resources/PinotSegmentUploadDownloadRestletResource.java:
##
@@ -555,6 +750,67 @@ public
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13633#issuecomment-2232160351
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13633?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
swaminathanmanish commented on PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#issuecomment-2232159425
> > I suppose the scenario you are trying to optimize is when each minion
uploads more than one segment (presumably two, to split data over a time
boundary?) and hundreds of
swaminathanmanish commented on code in PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#discussion_r1680255251
##
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/helix/core/PinotHelixResourceManager.java:
##
@@ -2327,6 +2327,82 @@ public void
klsince commented on code in PR #13632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13632#discussion_r1680227655
##
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/utils/SegmentLocks.java:
##
@@ -18,30 +18,25 @@
*/
package org.apache.pinot.segment.local.utils;
abhioncbr opened a new pull request, #13633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13633
**Labels**
- `cleanup`
**Description**
As per the[ discussion
comment](https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13574#discussion_r1676402235) on
the
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13632#issuecomment-2232078122
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13632?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #13550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13550#discussion_r1680211463
##
pinot-minion/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/minion/api/resources/PinotMinionMetricsResource.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #13550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13550#discussion_r1680210207
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/metrics/AbstractMetrics.java:
##
@@ -494,6 +494,16 @@ public void addValueToGlobalGauge(final G gauge, final
Jackie-Jiang commented on issue #13629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629#issuecomment-2232072921
@tibrewalpratik17 Have you figured out thy the metric is not emitted?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Jackie-Jiang commented on issue #13629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629#issuecomment-2232071857
cc @zhtaoxiang
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #13541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13541#issuecomment-2232071149
My bad, now I see the problem.
Should we consider first looping over the ideal state and create a map from
serving partition to state, then only loop over this map in the second
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13631
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jasperjiaguo commented on code in PR #13533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13533#discussion_r1680198511
##
pinot-core/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/optimizer/QueryOptimizerTest.java:
##
@@ -293,6 +293,11 @@ public void testQueries() {
+ "AND
jasperjiaguo commented on code in PR #13533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13533#discussion_r1680197805
##
pinot-core/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/optimizer/QueryOptimizerTest.java:
##
@@ -293,6 +293,11 @@ public void testQueries() {
+ "AND
jasperjiaguo commented on code in PR #13533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13533#discussion_r1680197805
##
pinot-core/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/optimizer/QueryOptimizerTest.java:
##
@@ -293,6 +293,11 @@ public void testQueries() {
+ "AND
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13631#issuecomment-2231945461
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13631?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
sullis opened a new pull request, #13631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13631
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
itschrispeck commented on PR #13541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13541#issuecomment-2231869927
> I don't fully follow the change. When there is no partition assigned to
the given instance, the loop should all be skipped, and it should return GOOD
right?
Not sure I
xiangfu0 commented on PR #13630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13630#issuecomment-2231855672
> `boolean[]` should not flow into the segment creation engine. Its value
should already be replaced with internal storage format within
`DataTypeTransformer`
good point! I
jtao15 commented on PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#issuecomment-2231850381
@rajagopr Thank you for the interesting PR. I'd like to take a look soon.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13630#issuecomment-2231847982
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13630?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
aditya0811 commented on issue #12809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12809#issuecomment-2231704910
Are these still open questions? I was unable to approach this as part of
this issue.
a) When we are adding src/main/java21, by configuring a different profile,
how are we
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13621
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13620:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13620
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13624
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13622
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jackie-Jiang closed pull request #13625: Bump org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients
from 2.8.1 to 7.6.2-ce
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13625
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13623
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #13625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13625#issuecomment-2231636486
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major or minor version,
Jackie-Jiang closed issue #13595: Multi-stage engine might break MV filter
semantic
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13595
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13618
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jadami10 commented on issue #11893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11893#issuecomment-2231604530
we only saw it on this 1 table. So I've assumed it's somewhat tied to JSON
columns
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #13614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13614
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rajagopr commented on PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#issuecomment-2231578183
> I suppose the scenario you are trying to optimize is when each minion
uploads more than one segment (presumably two, to split data over a time
boundary?) and hundreds of minions
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #13614:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13614#issuecomment-2231579057
Discussed offline. We will merge this one to reduce the overhead, in the
meanwhile trying to figure out a thorough solution.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#issuecomment-2231572794
@mcvsubbu We want to optimize the scenario where multiple clients trying to
push segments, each with multiple segments to push, not necessary from minion.
The bottleneck right now
shounakmk219 commented on issue #11893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11893#issuecomment-2231519384
I see. I will try to test out few hypothesis to repro this with the old code
as well.
Also wanted to confirm if this issue was seen on just one table or do you
remember any
jadami10 commented on issue #11893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11893#issuecomment-2231445800
unfortunately this issue is all the context I have as the table has long
since retentioned any data that did not have that column
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
kishoreg commented on code in PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#discussion_r1679749949
##
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/api/resources/PinotSegmentUploadDownloadRestletResource.java:
##
@@ -555,6 +750,67 @@ public void
mcvsubbu commented on PR #13597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13597#issuecomment-2231327374
I suppose the scenario you are trying to optimize is when each minion
uploads more than one segment (presumably two, to split data over a time
boundary?) and hundreds of minions working
tibrewalpratik17 opened a new issue, #13629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629
We use `llcPartitionConsuming` to monitor whether Pinot is ingesting data
for every partition across all replicas. However, we have been experiencing
numerous flaky alerts because Pinot sometimes
tibrewalpratik17 commented on issue #13466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13466#issuecomment-2231278395
Closing as the behaviour is fixed in #13579
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
tibrewalpratik17 closed issue #13466: _enableSnapshot loads upsert segments
from snapshot even if _enablePreload is disabled
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13466
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
shounakmk219 commented on issue #11893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11893#issuecomment-2231122702
Hey @jadami10 , I tried to follow the mentioned steps with the latest master
and was not able to reproduce the issue.
Would like to get some more context on this.
>
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13628#issuecomment-2231068266
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13628?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
vrajat commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679509981
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/config/table/QuotaConfig.java:
##
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ public class QuotaConfig extends BaseJsonConfig {
private static
yashmayya commented on PR #13628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13628#issuecomment-2230936245
Metric name and broker config are up for debate (naming is hard)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
codecov-commenter commented on PR #13627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13627#issuecomment-2230935692
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/13627?dropdown=coverage=pr=h1_medium=referral_source=github_content=comment_campaign=pr+comments_term=apache)
Report
yashmayya opened a new pull request, #13628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13628
- With the v2 / multi-stage query engine becoming more robust and feature
complete
(https://github.com/apache/pinot/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Amulti-stage+is%3Aclosed),
existing users might want to
shounakmk219 opened a new pull request, #13627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13627
This PR prints the `StarTreeV2BuilderConfig` for existing star-trees on the
segment and the incoming star-trees from the updated table config.
This will help to understand why certain
Jayesh-Asrani opened a new issue, #13626:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13626
1. Steps to re-produce : Create a Realtime table with a sorted column id
and few other Multi value columns
2. Ingest wrong data into pinot for the MV columns where the columns are
represented
shounakmk219 commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679336060
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/config/table/QuotaConfig.java:
##
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ public class QuotaConfig extends BaseJsonConfig {
private
shounakmk219 commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679333442
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/utils/DatabaseUtils.java:
##
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
import
shounakmk219 commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679330670
##
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/queryquota/HelixExternalViewBasedQueryQuotaManager.java:
##
@@ -46,21 +55,31 @@
import org.slf4j.Logger;
shounakmk219 commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679329428
##
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/queryquota/HelixExternalViewBasedQueryQuotaManager.java:
##
@@ -230,6 +248,72 @@ private void
shounakmk219 commented on PR #13550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13550#issuecomment-2230801206
@Jackie-Jiang based on your inputs updated the code to expose just the gauge
values for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
vrajat commented on code in PR #13544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13544#discussion_r1679268404
##
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/queryquota/HelixExternalViewBasedQueryQuotaManager.java:
##
@@ -46,21 +55,31 @@
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13625
Bumps org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients from 2.8.1 to 7.6.2-ce.
[![Dependabot compatibility
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13624
Bumps [com.azure:azure-core](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java)
from 1.49.1 to 1.50.0.
Release notes
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13623
Bumps [commons-codec:commons-codec](https://github.com/apache/commons-codec)
from 1.17.0 to 1.17.1.
Changelog
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13622
Bumps [com.h2database:h2](https://github.com/h2database/h2database) from
2.2.224 to 2.3.230.
Release notes
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13621
Bumps
[com.azure:azure-core-http-netty](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java)
from 1.15.1 to 1.15.2.
Release notes
Sourced from
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #13620:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13620
Bumps `confluent.version` from 7.6.1 to 7.6.2.
Updates `io.confluent:kafka-schema-registry-client` from 7.6.1 to 7.6.2
Commits
See full diff in
gortiz commented on issue #12809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12809#issuecomment-2230610695
> we should also care for this because of End of Live (EOL) for Red Hat
builds of Openjdk v11 on 30 Oct 2024
see e.g. https://endoflife.date/redhat-build-of-openjdk
Just to
yashmayya commented on PR #13618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13618#issuecomment-2230571414
That makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
gortiz commented on code in PR #13618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13618#discussion_r1679161515
##
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/MultiStageEngineIntegrationTest.java:
##
@@ -704,6 +704,26 @@ public void
1 - 100 of 21316 matches
Mail list logo
