[GitHub] [pulsar] ashwallace commented on issue #7058: Pulsar on EBS having poor performance

ashwallace commented on issue #7058: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/7058#issuecomment-637255249 Great work! I must have interpreted the graph as a single EC2 instance, but it must have been the aggregate of all 13 instances/ Make sure to resize EC2 again to optimize cost

[GitHub] [pulsar] ashwallace commented on issue #7058: Pulsar on EBS having poor performance

ashwallace commented on issue #7058: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/7058#issuecomment-635066612 > > > @ashwallace But that doesn't explain why when on the pod itself using `dd` I'm able to access the EBS at 200 mbyte/s. > > I will change the cluster to one that

[GitHub] [pulsar] ashwallace commented on issue #7058: Pulsar on EBS having poor performance

ashwallace commented on issue #7058: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/7058#issuecomment-635024332 EC2 r5.large has a baseline EBS throughput of ~81 MB/s at 128 KB IO sizes. Looks like you're at around that number more or less. Because of this fact, you may not be a benefit by