lhotari commented on issue #10439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10439#issuecomment-1246610755
Pulsar uses Bookkeeper protocol V2 by default because V3 uses GRPC and that
is not "garbage free". With V2 protocol, there is less GC overhead.
The backpressure feature in boo
lhotari commented on issue #10439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10439#issuecomment-1209524109
Fixes for backpressure issues on bookkeeper side:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3321,
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3323,
https://github.com/apache/bookkeep
lhotari commented on issue #10439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10439#issuecomment-1123187057
related: #14861 and https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3139
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
lhotari commented on issue #10439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10439#issuecomment-904699303
There is also https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2521 in BK related
to the lack of backpressure configuration in Pulsar by default.
--
This is an automated message from t
lhotari commented on issue #10439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10439#issuecomment-829147823
@eolivelli Would it be possible to cherry-pick #9232 to branch-2.7 so that
it would be possible to configure `waitTimeoutOnBackpressureMs` on the broker
side by using `bookkeeper_wa
