merlimat commented on issue #6791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6791#issuecomment-618531886
> I see there is a problem in the current algorithm when scaling down the
number of consumers. But I don't think its broken.
The Key Shared subscriptions has 2 stated goals:
merlimat commented on issue #6791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6791#issuecomment-618223059
> Since the current algorithm has been used in many production environments
already, we should be concerned about removing an existing implementation.
Providing a way to opt-in a diffe
merlimat commented on issue #6791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6791#issuecomment-618176136
> If users want to more evenly distributed, they will increase the points.
I'm worried about too many consumers(e.g. 5000 consumers) may result in too
many nodes in the TreeMap.
merlimat commented on issue #6791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6791#issuecomment-618109262
@codelipenghui AUTO_SPLIT and CONSISTENT_HASHING are essentially 2 different
implementations for the same stated behavior. In my view, we should just give
the user one good default opt
merlimat commented on issue #6791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6791#issuecomment-617958166
> I need to rethink how to leverage this idea on the consistent hashing
approach. If you have any idea, please ping me, thanks.
@codelipenghui Thanks for pointing to this. I have
