wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-620083839
> Another thing I am thinking, wouldn't it be better to offer the Go client
with those binaries already built?
Yes, for different versions, we have provided
wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-620083839
> Another thing I am thinking, wouldn't it be better to offer the Go client
with those binaries already built?
Yes, for different versions, we have provided
wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-620085461
> Thank you, I am going to look at it and see if I can build and that was
the issue.
If possible, you can use the native go client to instead cgo client. As
wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-620085461
> Thank you, I am going to look at it and see if I can build and that was
the issue.
If possible, you can use the native go client to instead cgo client. As
wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-619390621
Thanks @JoseFMP feedback. Currently, you are building a [cgo version of
pulsar-client-go](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pulsar-client-go),
this repo
wolfstudy edited a comment on issue #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/234#issuecomment-619390621
Thanks @JoseFMP feedback. Currently, you are building a cgo version of
pulsar-client-go, this repo is a native go client. And the repo
