dao-jun closed issue #22866: High GC pause cases high publish latency
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22866
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
lhotari commented on issue #22866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22866#issuecomment-2167218549
> I think so. But we might need to improve here to avoid allocating a very
large `long[]` to give GC pressure. :)
One alternative would be to switch to use
mattisonchao commented on issue #22866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22866#issuecomment-2154038308
>Btw. The metric might be wrong. It's not necessarily pause time, but GC
time that happens in the background. See
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18891
I
lhotari commented on issue #22866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22866#issuecomment-2154013458
Btw. The metric might be wrong. It's not necessarily pause time, but GC time
that happens in the background.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
shibd opened a new issue, #22866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22866
### Search before asking
- [X] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues)
and found nothing similar.
### Motivation
We have observed that using Individual
