On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 01:32:54 +0200:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
I think this fix is wrong. svn_fs_fs__read_noderev() should return the
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 01:32:54 +0200:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
I think this fix is wrong. svn_fs_fs__read_noderev() should return the
parsed noderev as is --- if it's a revision file and the noderev
contains an
I think this fix is wrong. svn_fs_fs__read_noderev() should return the
parsed noderev as is --- if it's a revision file and the noderev
contains an is-fresh-txn-root field, then it needs to reflect that.
stef...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 23:52:17 -:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Sep 6 23:52:16 2012
New Revision: 1381808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381808view=rev
Log:
Address issue #4031 by ignoring the is-fresh-txn-root flag when
we read from committed revisions.
Note: This does not fix the root cause but fixed svnadmin verify
for
