saivivek116 commented on PR #2523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523#issuecomment-2000313968
Thank you for your feedback. The workflow I've proposed is primarily
designed to automate the steps I've taken to demonstrate that the test method
is flaky. However, upon
Cole-Greer commented on PR #2523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523#issuecomment-294972
No worries, if this is just a matter of swapping the HashSet with a
LinkedHashSet, that makes perfect sense to me and I would be happy to merge
that right away. If you think that
saivivek116 closed pull request #2523: Fixflaky
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
saivivek116 commented on PR #2523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523#issuecomment-1998822127
I apologize for the insufficient details in the PR. I am currently
preparing a new pull request with a comprehensive description and all the
necessary details to ensure clarity.
Cole-Greer commented on PR #2523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523#issuecomment-1998628668
Hi @saivivek116, thanks for the submission. Could you give a quick
description of the changes? Was the test flaky simply due to the unpredictable
ordering of HashSet elements? What
saivivek116 opened a new pull request, #2523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2523
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
