Svetlin Zarev created TOMEE-2087:
------------------------------------

             Summary: TomEE's naming binds objects in wrong contexts
                 Key: TOMEE-2087
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2087
             Project: TomEE
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Svetlin Zarev
            Priority: Critical
         Attachments: sample.zip

NameNode has some weird logic based on comparing hash codes,  which determines 
if the object has to be bound in lessTree, grtrTree, etc.  The issue is that it 
does not work correctly and binds the objects in the wrong contexts. For 
instance if lessTree/grtrTree is not  null and is a NameNode representing a 
subcontext, it will bind the object to that subcontext which is incorrect.

Context.lookup() seems to work because NameNode's bind()/resolve() follow the 
same logic, but if you inspect the naming context with Context.list() - which 
returns the correct information about the subcontexts, you'll see that some 
contexts have more name class pairs than should. 

To give an example:

Expected context content:
{code}
### Context: /module
Name: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB       
Class=org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.JndiBuilder$ContextualEjbLookup      
[looking up: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB]       [Value]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null
Name: TestEJB   
Class=org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.JndiBuilder$ContextualEjbLookup      
[looking up: TestEJB]   [Value]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null
Name: ModuleName        Class=java.lang.String  [looking up: ModuleName]        
[Value]: 
Name: env       Class=org.apache.naming.NamingContext   [looking up: env]       
[Value]: org.apache.naming.NamingContext@1bb2d0a8


### Context: /module/env
Name: name      Class=java.lang.String  [looking up: name]      [Value]: 
module-env
{code} 


Actual context content:
{code}


### Context: /module
Name: global    Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.IvmContext     
[looking up: global]    > Failed to lookup: global
Name: dummy     Class=java.lang.String  [looking up: dummy]     > Failed to 
lookup: dummy
Name: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB       
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB]       [Reference]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null
Name: TestEJB   
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB]   [Reference]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null
Name: ModuleName        Class=java.lang.String  [looking up: ModuleName]        
[Value]: 
Name: env       Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.IvmContext     
[looking up: env]       [Value]: IvmContext{mynode=}
Name: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB       
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB]       [Reference]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null
Name: TestEJB   
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB]   [Reference]: 
proxy=org.example.TestEJB;deployment=ROOT//TestEJB;pk=null


### Context: /module/env
Name: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB       
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB]       > Failed to lookup: 
TestEJB!org.example.TestEJB
Name: TestEJB   
Class=org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference     
[looking up: TestEJB]   > Failed to lookup: TestEJB
Name: name      Class=java.lang.String  [looking up: name]      [Value]: 
module-env
{code}

Note the "failed too lookup..." messages - these are all objects that MUST NOT 
be bound in that context.

I'm attaching an application that reproduces the issue. 

Requesting it like "http://localhost:8080/?ejb"; will print tomee's naming tree
Requesting it like "http://localhost:8080"; will print tomcat's naming tree



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to