Svetlin Zarev created TOMEE-2108: ------------------------------------ Summary: TomEEContainer (arquillian) does not clean up after failed deployment. Key: TOMEE-2108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2108 Project: TomEE Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Svetlin Zarev
h4. Problem: --- When the deployment fails, the DeployerEjb throws javax.ejb.EjbException and the "archiveName" is not added to "moduleIds". As a result when undeploy(Archive) is called, the associated DeployedApp is not found and clean up is not performed -> this results in tomcat's internal strucutures still keeping data for the faild webapp, which might break other (re)deployments wuth the same webapp name. h4. Steps to reproduce: --- Execute any of the CDI TCK test that are expected to fail. I tested with (passing.xml): {code} <test name="JSR-346 TCK"> <classes> <class name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.decorators.definition.broken.nodecoratedtypes.DecoratorWithNoDecoratedTypes1Test"/> <class name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.decorators.definition.broken.nodecoratedtypes.DecoratorWithNoDecoratedTypes2Test"/> </classes> </test> {code} The classes are deployed sequentally using the same war name. Both deployments will fail as expected. After undeploy is called for teh first one, a WARN message is logged: {code} VIII 04, 2017 9:59:47 PM org.apache.openejb.arquillian.common.TomEEContainer undeploy WARNING: 2fea4e92ef1679e3f8eaf0cc2ce557a56f68cb26.war was not deployed {code} So far so good, the deployment faild, so we might assume it was not really deployed and dismiss the warning. Unfortunately Tomcat did never perform a clean up for that app, so when the next test is deployed (with the same WAR name) we can see in the logs: {code} 04-Aug-2017 21:59:47.233 SEVERE [http-nio-35825-exec-5] sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Creation of the naming context failed: [javax.naming.OperationNotSupportedException: Context is read only] {code} That's not what we expected to see. This happens because in org.apache.naming.ContextAccessController#setSecurityToken, when the security token is being associated with the context name, it checks only if a token exists for that name, but not if it's thE same token: {code} public static void setSecurityToken(Object name, Object token) { SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager(); if (sm != null) { sm.checkPermission(new RuntimePermission( ContextAccessController.class.getName() + ".setSecurityToken")); } if ((!securityTokens.containsKey(name)) && (token != null)) { securityTokens.put(name, token); } } {code} And the root cause for that is that no clean up was performed (kind of related to: TOMEE-2098). h4. Proposal: --- Do clean up if the deployment fails. This would be as simple as adding catch(EjbException) in org.apache.openejb.arquillian.common.TomEEContainer#deploy(org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.Archive<?>): } catch (OpenEJBException | EJBException re) { // clean up in undeploy needs it moduleIds.put(archiveName, new DeployedApp(file.getAbsolutePath(), file)); re; } {code} Note that I've changed it to use the absolute path, because otherwise the ProvisioningResolver is not able to understand the relative path: {code} 04-Aug-2017 22:47:42.436 SEVERE [http-nio-42119-exec-9] org.apache.openejb.core.transaction.EjbTransactionUtil.handleSystemException EjbTransactionUtil.handleSystemException: Not a local file but no prefix specified: target/workdir/1/2fea4e92ef1679e3f8eaf0cc2ce557a56f68cb26.war. So can't resolve java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Not a local file but no prefix specified: target/workdir/1/2fea4e92ef1679e3f8eaf0cc2ce557a56f68cb26.war. So can't resolve at org.apache.openejb.loader.provisining.ProvisioningResolver.protocol(ProvisioningResolver.java:133) at org.apache.openejb.loader.provisining.ProvisioningResolver.realLocation(ProvisioningResolver.java:115) at org.apache.openejb.loader.ProvisioningUtil.realLocation(ProvisioningUtil.java:158) at org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.getAppInfo(Assembler.java:633) at org.apache.openejb.assembler.DeployerEjb.undeploy(DeployerEjb.java:410) {code} The issue is that the resolver cannot correctly resolve the absolute path. It thinks it is: {code} /home/svetlin/git/open-source/tomee/tck/cdi-tomee/target/tomee/apache-tomee-plus-7.0.4-SNAPSHOT/target/workdir/0/2fea4e92ef1679e3f8eaf0cc2ce557a56f68cb26.war {code} While it really is: {code} /home/svetlin/git/open-source/tomee/tck/cdi-tomee/target/workdir/0/2fea4e92ef1679e3f8eaf0cc2ce557a56f68cb26.war {code} h4. Summary --- * when the deployment fails, no clean up is done * do clean up after failed deplyments ** catch javax.ejb.EjbException besides OpenEjbException ** Use absolute path for DeployedApp.path in case of failed deployment What do you think ? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)