[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682257#action_12682257
]
Marat Radchenko commented on WICKET-2170:
-----------------------------------------
Gwyn, all files in source archive include Apache License headers.
> @StatelessComponent contribution by Marat Radchenko
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-2170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2170
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: wicket
> Reporter: Gwyn Evans
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: wicketextras-1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar, wicketextras.tar.gz
>
>
> From mailing list -
> http://www.nabble.com/Have-a-feature,-want-to-contribute-td21079751.html
> "Wicket pages/components can be either stateful or stateless. Wicket
> manages hem transparently and it is very easy to write any complex
> page you want. Stateful pages are much more powerful than stateless.
> However that comes at a cost of using page store for their state. On
> highload sites it is usually desired to minimize session-scope data,
> and move it to request-scope. That's when Wicket users approach a task
> of making stateful pages stateless. However stateless state (sic!) is
> very fragile, if you add a single stateful component to a page, it
> instantly becomes stateful (and you even might not notice that if your
> other page content can work in both modes. And here comes my lovely
> feature - @StatelessComponent. It is an annotation that you should put
> on components which you want to be stateless. It doesn't do any magic,
> it simply uses postComponentOnBeforeRender to assert that annotated
> component (and all its children) are stateless. If it doesn't, an
> exception is thrown, indicating what component tries to be stateful.
> This feature isn't large enough to be put in a separate project (just
> one annotation and one listener) but wee find it extremely useful on
> our project.
> I'd be happy to give it to Wicket project (or wicketstuff?) at
> absolutely no cost (tests included) under same license as wicket
> itself, if Wicket developers are interested in it."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
