Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-12 Thread Devaraj Das
+1 On 8/13/09 4:34 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce. -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-12 Thread Hemanth Yamijala
+1 Thanks Hemanth Owen O'Malley wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce. -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-12 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Hey Owen, To be clear, is this a feature freeze/branch date or a hopeful rc date? That is to say, can more work go on on existing features after this proposed date? This is the date when the release branch is cut. After the branch is cut

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-12 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hey Owen, To be clear, is this a feature freeze/branch date or a hopeful rc date? That is to say, can more work go on on existing features after this proposed date? Thanks -Todd On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > After the discussion settled last time, it seems th

[VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-12 Thread Owen O'Malley
All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce. -- Owen

Re: Contributing a New FileSystem Implementation - Questions About Process

2009-08-12 Thread Jonathan Seidman
Thanks for the pointers Tom and Cos, this is helpful. We'll take a look at these as we firm up our test plan. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Tom White wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > For testing you can subclass FileSystemContractBaseTest and create an > instance of the filesystem to test in the set

[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6190) Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken

2009-08-12 Thread Tom White (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White resolved HADOOP-6190. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Doug. This is fixed now. I've updated http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Mailin

[jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-6190) Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken

2009-08-12 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting reopened HADOOP-6190: -- Oops. I accidentally linked to lucene's mail archives! I fixed that and will wait until it show

[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6190) Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken

2009-08-12 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting resolved HADOOP-6190. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Doug Cutting Good idea. I created that link. Thanks for no

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-6191) Allow Super user access only from certian trusted IP Range- This is to avoid spoofing by others as super user and gain access to the cluster

2009-08-12 Thread Pallavi Palleti (JIRA)
Allow Super user access only from certian trusted IP Range- This is to avoid spoofing by others as super user and gain access to the cluster

[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6032) reference to java1.5 in conf/hadoop-env.sh

2009-08-12 Thread Steve Loughran (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-6032. Resolution: Duplicate > reference to java1.5 in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -

Re: Contributing a New FileSystem Implementation - Questions About Process

2009-08-12 Thread Tom White
Hi Jonathan, For testing you can subclass FileSystemContractBaseTest and create an instance of the filesystem to test in the set up method, to check that the new implementation conforms to the contract of the FileSystem interface (although see also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-303).

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-6190) Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken

2009-08-12 Thread Tom White (JIRA)
Links to Hadoop mailing list mbox files are broken -- Key: HADOOP-6190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6190 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom Wh

Re: Using commons-net version 2.0 in maven repository for commons-net-ftp.jar

2009-08-12 Thread Pallavi Palleti
Hi Todd, Yes. I am also afraid of the same. I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6187. For now, I have kept it to use version 2.0. Thanks Pallavi - Original Message - From: "Todd Lipcon" To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:15:54