Hi Jakob,
Thanks for clarifying this to me.
Niels
2011/1/7 Jakob Homan :
> Niels-
> Thanks for the contribution. For the moment your task is done.
> Now it's up to a committer to review the patch and, either provide you
> with feedback for its improvement, or commit it. It's in the patch
> a
Niels-
Thanks for the contribution. For the moment your task is done.
Now it's up to a committer to review the patch and, either provide you
with feedback for its improvement, or commit it. It's in the patch
available state, which is the flag for reviewers to know there's work
for them to do.
On Jan 8, 2011, at 4:44 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> To prevent future race conditions, let me formally be the RM for 0.20.3.
> Please check with me before any commits to the 0.20 branch.
>
Great news..
Thanks Owen.
> -- Owen
On Jan 5, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
Is 20.3 a 'dead' release ?
I haven't seen any discussion of this on the apache lists about
creating a 20.3 release, and kind of goes against all the discussion
that we recently had with StAck about creating a 'append' release on
0.20.
It i
Hi,
I consider the patch I created to be ready for review by a code reviewer.
It does what I want it to do and Hudson gives an overall +1.
The http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute was unclear to me on
what to do next.
So, what should I do?
Simply wait / change the stated of the issue /
