[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9602) Trash#moveToAppropriateTrash should output logs of execution instead of STDOUT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA resolved HADOOP-9602. Resolution: Not A Problem [~daryn]: Thank for your review. One of our use case is to reuse

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 I did basic verification and testing of the rc. Thanks, --Konst On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Thomas Graves wrote: > > I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.8 that I would like > to release. > > This release is a sustaining release with several important bug fixes in > it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

+1 Thanks, --Konst On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha. > > The difference between rc1 and rc2 is the "optimistic release date" is set > for > 06/06/2013 in the CHANGES.txt files. > > The binary artifact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 (non-binding) Built from source, ran some basic tests on a single node cluster. -- Hitesh On May 28, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Thomas Graves wrote: > > I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.8 that I would like > to release. > > This release is a sustaining release with several im

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 Checksum and signature match, ran some tests. -C On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > +1 (non-binding). Did a full build from source and ran a few sample jobs > on a pseudo-distributed cluster. > > -Sandy > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Kihwal Lee wrote: > >> +1 I've d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Built from source, ran a few sample jobs on a pseudo-distributed cluster On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 > > Checksum and signature match, ran some unit tests, checked diff > against 2.0.4-alpha. > > Thanks for seeing this through, Cos. -C > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha. > > The difference between rc1 and rc2 is the "optimistic release date" is set for > 06/06/2013 in the CHANGES.txt files. > > The binary artifact is the same - there's no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

+1 Checksum and signature match, ran some unit tests, checked diff against 2.0.4-alpha. Thanks for seeing this through, Cos. -C On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > +1 RC2. Verified MD5 & signature, checked CHANGES.txt files, built, > configured pseudo cluster, run a coup

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 (non-binding). Did a full build from source and ran a few sample jobs on a pseudo-distributed cluster. -Sandy On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Kihwal Lee wrote: > +1 I've downloaded & built the RC and ran several tests on a single node > cluster. > > Kihwal > > On 5/28/13 11:00 AM, "Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

Verified bits, ran sample jobs on a cluster. +1 (binding) Arun On May 28, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Thomas Graves wrote: > > I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.8 that I would like > to release. > > This release is a sustaining release with several important bug fixes in > it. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

+1 RC2. Verified MD5 & signature, checked CHANGES.txt files, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha. > > The difference between rc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc2)

I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha. The difference between rc1 and rc2 is the "optimistic release date" is set for 06/06/2013 in the CHANGES.txt files. The binary artifact is the same - there's no need to rebuild it. The maven artifacts are the same. The difference

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 I've downloaded & built the RC and ran several tests on a single node cluster. Kihwal On 5/28/13 11:00 AM, "Thomas Graves" wrote: > >I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.8 that I would like >to release. > >This release is a sustaining release with several important bug fixe

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9617) HA HDFS client is too strict with validating URI authorities

Aaron T. Myers created HADOOP-9617: -- Summary: HA HDFS client is too strict with validating URI authorities Key: HADOOP-9617 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9617 Project: Hadoop Comm

Re: HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

thanks On 3 June 2013 17:20, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Steve, I will review this. Might need a couple of days though. > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Steve Loughran >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We've got the HADOOP-8545< > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545>patch > > stable e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc1)

NOTE: for consistency I'm moving my vote to the RC1 thread. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > All, > > I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would > like to release. > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha

Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once again. Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before. Cos On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01

Re: HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

Steve, I will review this. Might need a couple of days though. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Hi, > > We've got the HADOOP-8545< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545>patch > stable enough that I'd like it checked in and in the 2.1 beta so that > we can see

HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

Hi, We've got the HADOOP-8545patch stable enough that I'd like it checked in and in the 2.1 beta so that we can see what problems occur in the field. The patch adds a new module, hadoop-tools/hadoop-openstack, so it doesn't break anything in had

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9616) In branch-2, baseline of Javadoc Warnings (specified in test-patch.properties) is mismatch with Javadoc warnings in current codebase

Junping Du created HADOOP-9616: -- Summary: In branch-2, baseline of Javadoc Warnings (specified in test-patch.properties) is mismatch with Javadoc warnings in current codebase Key: HADOOP-9616 URL: https://issues.apa

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-Common-trunk #788

See Changes: [szetszwo] Move node group block placement JIRAs to 2.1.0-beta in CHANGES.txt. [szetszwo] Move HADOOP-8469 and HADOOP-8470 to 2.1.0-beta in CHANGES.txt. [acmurthy] YARN-730. Fix NMClientAsync to remove completed contai